From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: "Keith Packard" <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: parsecvs and unnamed branches
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:39:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e4733910606161539t2485e3b3xa9f2852a4d2fc18f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150496362.6983.34.camel@neko.keithp.com>
On 6/16/06, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 17:44 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > I'm getting thousands of messages about unnamed branches and even
> > 'unnamed branch from master-UNNAMED-BRANCH'.
> >
> > How do you get unnamed branches into CVS, are these check-in errors or
> > are people actually working on unnamed branches? Or is parsecvs not
> > finding all of the branch info?
>
> branch names rely on a special 'branch tag' in the "symbols" section of
> the CVS file, but actual branches are flagged directly in the revision
> list. I don't know how it happens, but ,v files often end up with
> branches in the revision tree which haven't an associated tag. Go
> figure.
>
> For example, in the top level mozilla/Makefile.in,v file, you'll see a
> branch from version 1.36 with an initial commit 1.36.2.1. Using the
> wacky CVS branch revision numbering scheme, there should be an
> associated tag for version 1.36.0.2 (yes, the last two digits are
> flipped). But, none is present in the file.
There is a branch label for SeaMonkey_M8_BRANCH:1.36.0.4 that does
seems to correspond to anything. Could that be the missing tag?
>
> The reverse situation also occurs, with tags for branches that have no
> revisions in the file. This case makes sense -- until you make a change
> in a file along a branch, there will be no other record in the file of
> where the branch came from.
>
> I'd love to figure out a better mechanism for merging these nameless
> branches into the resulting repository, but I don't know how to
> correlate unnamed branches in one file with unnamed branches in other
> files.
>
> The current scheme of making up a fixed name and hoping that there
> aren't multiple unmamed branches from the same root is probably fraught
> with peril.
>
> --
> keith.packard@intel.com
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBEky5qQp8BWwlsTdMRAvI1AJ4nXKyzeupTDarXI+yM0zvuHaCoTQCdEBYC
> Kl7lEHIJgi5Tk24quc9FZyM=
> =FA7H
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-16 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-16 21:44 parsecvs and unnamed branches Jon Smirl
2006-06-16 22:19 ` Keith Packard
2006-06-16 22:28 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-16 22:39 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2006-06-16 22:51 ` Keith Packard
2006-06-17 3:02 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-17 3:12 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-06-17 3:31 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-17 4:08 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-06-17 4:15 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-17 4:35 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-06-17 5:30 ` Keith Packard
2006-06-17 5:51 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-17 17:13 ` Keith Packard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e4733910606161539t2485e3b3xa9f2852a4d2fc18f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).