From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jon Smirl" Subject: VCS comparison table Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:07:18 -0400 Message-ID: <9e4733910610140807p633f5660q49dd2d2111c9f5fe@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 14 17:08:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYl7G-0003Ll-O8 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:07:59 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422669AbWJNPHx (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:07:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422675AbWJNPHx (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:07:53 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.178]:36947 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422669AbWJNPHw (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:07:52 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n25so1570534pyg for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:07:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=VWo3fSliHjGAHZLOUALSnqPdSm3Rn0quJk8w/VoQQWfefmYHhqGMDJUEvVcWhtZibaBPx8x28lo3ca6ased2UFLoMeqa7zvLx/Ij7DGA1TBX1VYJEuk6WJ+17WS+Z2YQSPUwTRv2mZKQPvCMfIlr4ii1yOY+sqJ/OvOot56KGXw= Received: by 10.35.121.2 with SMTP id y2mr8269110pym; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.60.14 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:07:18 -0700 (PDT) To: "Git Mailing List" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I was reading Brendan's blog post about Mozilla 2 http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roadmap/archives/2006/10/mozilla_2.html It refers to this comparison chart between source control systems. http://bazaar-vcs.org/RcsComparisons Does it accurately reflect the current status of git? Is their assessment of git's rename capability correct? They want changes via IRC. "Please discuss changes to this table on the freenode IRC network channel #bzr, or on the mailing list. The terms used in the table have precise meanings, and not all VCS's use the same term in the same way - which means that some translation is needed to fill it in properly." -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com