From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: "Karl Hasselström" <kha@treskal.com>
Cc: "Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: stgit: per branch cover letters
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:03:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e4733910801250903qcb53430p522b36197443a030@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080125164633.GA12321@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
On 1/25/08, Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> wrote:
> On 2008-01-25 09:57:50 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > It would be convenient to have per branch cover letters that are
> > stored by stg and get automatically applied when a patch set is
> > mailed. Use 'stg edit' to alter them. The first time you email a
> > series you would get an editor to write the cover letter if you
> > hadn't already done it. You could track the "to=" this way also.
>
> I don't think we need to get quite that fancy. Wouldn't it suffice to
> have a --cover-file=<filename> option to stg mail, and if both
> --cover-file and --edit-cover were given, update that file with new
> diffstat etc?
I have five patch sets I'm currently juggling. It would be a lot more
convenient if stg remembered which cover letter went with the patch
set, the recipients for the mail and the current patch version/prefix.
In my tree each patch set is in it's own branch.
I can edit the config file to change these if need, I don't need a
fancy editor interface.
>
> And per-branch config options if you want to set these permanently, of
> course.
>
> > Another useful feature would be a config option that says something
> > like "prompt for new version" when mailed. Now each time you mail
> > the series it throws you into the cover page editor with an
> > incremented patch version. You can just quit out of the editor if
> > you don't want to increment the version.
>
> Patches without cover letters can also have versions, so I don't think
> associating versions with cover letters is a splendid idea, but I get
> your point.
>
> I guess a solution much like the one for cover letters would work
> here. A separate file, and command-line and config options to point to
> it.
>
> > I didn't know I wanted features like this until I made a patch that
> > has gone through 25 versions.
>
> Your feedback is much appreciated. Keep at it!
>
> --
> Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
> www.treskal.com/kalle
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-25 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-25 14:57 stgit: per branch cover letters Jon Smirl
2008-01-25 16:46 ` Karl Hasselström
2008-01-25 17:03 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e4733910801250903qcb53430p522b36197443a030@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kha@treskal.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).