* did anyone see my message re "git smart http server ..."? @ 2010-09-18 2:18 Miles Bader 2010-09-18 3:23 ` Ilari Liusvaara 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Miles Bader @ 2010-09-18 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Git Mailing List I sent a message to the git mailing list yesterday, with the subject line: Subject: git "smart http" server vs. http redirects but it doesn't seem to have turned up in any archives, although many messages sent later seem to have been received. Did anyone see my message? Is there some kind of spam filtering on the list that might have eaten it...? Thanks, -Miles -- Cat is power. Cat is peace. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: did anyone see my message re "git smart http server ..."? 2010-09-18 2:18 did anyone see my message re "git smart http server ..."? Miles Bader @ 2010-09-18 3:23 ` Ilari Liusvaara 2010-09-18 3:26 ` Miles Bader 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Ilari Liusvaara @ 2010-09-18 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Miles Bader; +Cc: Git Mailing List On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:18:20AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > I sent a message to the git mailing list yesterday, with the subject line: > > Subject: git "smart http" server vs. http redirects > > Did anyone see my message? Is there some kind of spam filtering on > the list that might have eaten it...? I searched my own git mailbox, no match. The most important filter on mailinglist is that all messages even containing HTML part are junked. There are also some forbidden words (and word combinations) that cause message to be dropped. -Ilari ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: did anyone see my message re "git smart http server ..."? 2010-09-18 3:23 ` Ilari Liusvaara @ 2010-09-18 3:26 ` Miles Bader 2010-09-18 8:36 ` Andreas Ericsson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Miles Bader @ 2010-09-18 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilari Liusvaara; +Cc: Git Mailing List On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:18:20AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: >> I sent a message to the git mailing list yesterday, with the subject line: >> >> Subject: git "smart http" server vs. http redirects >> >> Did anyone see my message? Is there some kind of spam filtering on >> the list that might have eaten it...? > > I searched my own git mailbox, no match. > > The most important filter on mailinglist is that all messages even > containing HTML part are junked. There are also some forbidden words > (and word combinations) that cause message to be dropped. yay. Nothing like ad-hoc spam filters that silently drop messages! My message contained some examples of an http output stream, i dunno maybe it's unhappy with some of that... So... what is one supposed to do in this situation? Randomly delete parts of the message and resend it until something gets through? Thanks, -Miles -- Cat is power. Cat is peace. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: did anyone see my message re "git smart http server ..."? 2010-09-18 3:26 ` Miles Bader @ 2010-09-18 8:36 ` Andreas Ericsson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Andreas Ericsson @ 2010-09-18 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Miles Bader; +Cc: Ilari Liusvaara, Git Mailing List On 09/18/2010 05:26 AM, Miles Bader wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Ilari Liusvaara > <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:18:20AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: >>> I sent a message to the git mailing list yesterday, with the subject line: >>> >>> Subject: git "smart http" server vs. http redirects >>> >>> Did anyone see my message? Is there some kind of spam filtering on >>> the list that might have eaten it...? >> >> I searched my own git mailbox, no match. >> >> The most important filter on mailinglist is that all messages even >> containing HTML part are junked. There are also some forbidden words >> (and word combinations) that cause message to be dropped. > > yay. Nothing like ad-hoc spam filters that silently drop messages! > Replying to spam is actually worse, since it's impossible to know the real source address of email. Many spammers used spamfilters to send spam when the filters used to reply to spam. Nowadays one usually gets a "here's some spam I'm not sure about" mail every once in a while, but that's obviously not going to work for a mailing list. > My message contained some examples of an http output stream, i dunno > maybe it's unhappy with some of that... > > So... what is one supposed to do in this situation? Randomly delete > parts of the message and resend it until something gets through? > Rephrase it, and possibly get rid of pasted output. I'm sure you've seen enough spam to know what triggers spamfilters. Removing 'smart', and especially 'git smart' from the subject line would probably be a good idea. Levenshtein distance does matter, and 1 is not very far. It's so very convenient to concatenate with just about anything if you want to sell something to someone. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-18 8:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-09-18 2:18 did anyone see my message re "git smart http server ..."? Miles Bader 2010-09-18 3:23 ` Ilari Liusvaara 2010-09-18 3:26 ` Miles Bader 2010-09-18 8:36 ` Andreas Ericsson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).