git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes
       [not found] <AANLkTik8Npy99jKqUan8wOTXNffBCGwS_WnPwbhXqJYK@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2010-08-03 10:42 ` Jon Seymour
  2010-08-04 22:44 ` Jon Seymour
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2010-08-03 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Git Mailing List

| fixed the subject line - sorry !

This series fixes git stash branch so that it is more tolerant of
stash-like commits created with git stash create.

It particular, it doesn't require there to be a stash stack if a
stash-like argument is specified and it doesn't attempt to drop
non-stash references after applying the stash.

This series replaces my previous patch that just included a test
that demonstrated the existance of the issue.

 stash: It looks like a stash, but doesn't quack like a stash...
 stash: Allow git stash branch to process commits that look like
   stashes but are not stash references.
 stash: modify tests to reflect stash branch fixes.

 git-stash.sh     |   10 ++++++++--
 t/t3903-stash.sh |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--
1.7.2.1.111.g8fc90

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes
       [not found] <AANLkTik8Npy99jKqUan8wOTXNffBCGwS_WnPwbhXqJYK@mail.gmail.com>
  2010-08-03 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes Jon Seymour
@ 2010-08-04 22:44 ` Jon Seymour
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2010-08-04 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Git Mailing List

Hi, does anyone see any reason why this series could not be a
candidate for merging into next or master? If there is some reason for
me to re-post it, let me know.

Regards,

jon.

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> wrote:
> | fixed the subject line - sorry !
>
> This series fixes git stash branch so that it is more tolerant of
> stash-like commits created with git stash create.
>
> It particular, it doesn't require there to be a stash stack if a
> stash-like argument is specified and it doesn't attempt to drop
> non-stash references after applying the stash.
>
> This series replaces my previous patch that just included a test
> that demonstrated the existance of the issue.
>
>  stash: It looks like a stash, but doesn't quack like a stash...
>  stash: Allow git stash branch to process commits that look like
>    stashes but are not stash references.
>  stash: modify tests to reflect stash branch fixes.
>
>  git-stash.sh     |   10 ++++++++--
>  t/t3903-stash.sh |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.2.1.111.g8fc90
>
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-04 22:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <AANLkTik8Npy99jKqUan8wOTXNffBCGwS_WnPwbhXqJYK@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-03 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes Jon Seymour
2010-08-04 22:44 ` Jon Seymour

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).