From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Ebert <info@ralfebert.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: Better warning message on git reset --mixed <paths>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:13:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ddi_fek3NxF=ESM6HP3Myn6sa1xfsWMyNCUFB@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim=TM_3aXMSSN1-vovdc3z6QNR15KHujiJ-wH4_@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 00:59, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So it's a question of whether git-reset should do all reset-y things
>> without complaining, even when that infringes on git-checkout's
>> domain.
>
> Of course one question is: why is this "git-checkout's domain" in the
> first place?
>
> From a UI perspective this functionality doesn't seem to make any more
> sense in checkout -- and perhaps _less_ -- than it does in git-reset.
> "git-checkout <path>" seems like a tacked-on-to-make-cvs-users-happy
> wart rather than a natural part of git-checkout.
>
> I know that as a beginning git user, I always tried to use "git-reset
> --hard <path>", because that sort of made sense in my mental model of
> git commands, only to be confused when it didn't work. The fact that
> one actually needed to to do git-checkout instead was confusing.
Yeah, maybe one command to reset a file to various states makes more
sense than a singular "checking it out".
Anyway, this is the sort of thing I was alluding to, it won't do to
make micro-changes to the UI without considering the bigger picture.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-14 19:34 [PATCH] reset: Better warning message on git reset --mixed <paths> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-08-14 21:05 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-08-15 1:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-15 2:43 ` Miles Bader
2010-08-15 8:38 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-08-15 18:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-15 19:49 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-08-15 22:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-15 20:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-08-15 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-16 0:59 ` Miles Bader
2010-08-16 1:13 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2010-08-15 21:05 ` Ralf Ebert
2010-08-16 0:12 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-08-15 13:02 ` David Fries
2010-08-15 8:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-08-16 3:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-16 4:23 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=ddi_fek3NxF=ESM6HP3Myn6sa1xfsWMyNCUFB@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=info@ralfebert.de \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).