* command return values
@ 2010-07-11 4:11 Brian Craft
2010-07-11 4:18 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-07-11 11:37 ` Jeff King
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Craft @ 2010-07-11 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
btw, the "faq" link on http://git-scm.com/ is broken.
I'm finding that "git clone" doesn't return useful error codes, e.g.
trying to clone from a bad repository. Also, it doesn't abort if you
try to clone a branch that doesn't exist. The command succeeds,
leaving you with the wrong result. I haven't found a way to tell when
the command really succeeds, except for scraping the output.
What's the deal?
b.c.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: command return values
2010-07-11 4:11 command return values Brian Craft
@ 2010-07-11 4:18 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-07-11 11:37 ` Jeff King
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sverre Rabbelier @ 2010-07-11 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Craft, John 'Warthog9' Hawley; +Cc: git
Heya,
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 23:11, Brian Craft <bcboy@thecraftstudio.com> wrote:
> btw, the "faq" link on http://git-scm.com/ is broken.
It seems that the git wiki is down?
--
Cheers,
Sverre Rabbelier
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: command return values
2010-07-11 4:11 command return values Brian Craft
2010-07-11 4:18 ` Sverre Rabbelier
@ 2010-07-11 11:37 ` Jeff King
2010-07-11 14:53 ` Brian Craft
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2010-07-11 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Craft; +Cc: git
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 09:11:18PM -0700, Brian Craft wrote:
> I'm finding that "git clone" doesn't return useful error codes, e.g.
> trying to clone from a bad repository. Also, it doesn't abort if you
> try to clone a branch that doesn't exist. The command succeeds,
> leaving you with the wrong result. I haven't found a way to tell when
> the command really succeeds, except for scraping the output.
It should give useful error codes. I see:
$ git clone parent child; echo $?
Cloning into child...
done.
0
$ git clone bogus child; echo $?
Cloning into child...
fatal: '/home/peff/foo/bogus' does not appear to be a git repository
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
128
$ find parent -depth | xargs chmod ogu-r
$ git clone parent child; echo $?
Cloning into child...
fatal: failed to open '/home/peff/foo/parent/.git/objects': Permission
denied
128
So those all seem reasonable. Is there some other case of a "bad
repository" that fails but gets you a zero exit code?
For the case of a non-existent branch, I see:
$ git clone -b bogus parent child; echo $?
Cloning into child...
done.
warning: Remote branch bogus not found in upstream origin, using HEAD
instead
0
So yes, it completes with a warning. I agree that is not ideal, as a
script that clones has no idea that it did not actually get the data it
was looking for.
I think the rationale for not aborting totally is that we have done
significant work (including network traffic) during the clone, and the
warning can generally be remedied with "git checkout the-right-branch".
We could perhaps keep the repository but signal with a non-zero exit
code.
The other option for a script is not to use "-b", which only impacts
checkout. Instead, you could do:
$ git clone -n parent child &&
cd child &&
git checkout -b interesting-branch origin/interesting-branch
which is just as efficient, but lets you react differently to failure of
each part. You can also break it down further into:
$ git init &&
git remote add origin parent &&
git fetch origin &&
git branch interesting-branch origin/interesting-branch &&
git checkout interesting-branch
but I don't think there is much point in doing so.
-Peff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: command return values
2010-07-11 11:37 ` Jeff King
@ 2010-07-11 14:53 ` Brian Craft
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Craft @ 2010-07-11 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff King; +Cc: git
Ah, you're right about the return value. I was losing it in a
scripting error. And breaking down "clone -b" is a good work-around
for the non-existent branch.
Thanks!
b.c.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 09:11:18PM -0700, Brian Craft wrote:
>
>> I'm finding that "git clone" doesn't return useful error codes, e.g.
>> trying to clone from a bad repository. Also, it doesn't abort if you
>> try to clone a branch that doesn't exist. The command succeeds,
>> leaving you with the wrong result. I haven't found a way to tell when
>> the command really succeeds, except for scraping the output.
>
> It should give useful error codes. I see:
>
> $ git clone parent child; echo $?
> Cloning into child...
> done.
> 0
>
> $ git clone bogus child; echo $?
> Cloning into child...
> fatal: '/home/peff/foo/bogus' does not appear to be a git repository
> fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
> 128
>
> $ find parent -depth | xargs chmod ogu-r
> $ git clone parent child; echo $?
> Cloning into child...
> fatal: failed to open '/home/peff/foo/parent/.git/objects': Permission
> denied
> 128
>
> So those all seem reasonable. Is there some other case of a "bad
> repository" that fails but gets you a zero exit code?
>
> For the case of a non-existent branch, I see:
>
> $ git clone -b bogus parent child; echo $?
> Cloning into child...
> done.
> warning: Remote branch bogus not found in upstream origin, using HEAD
> instead
> 0
>
> So yes, it completes with a warning. I agree that is not ideal, as a
> script that clones has no idea that it did not actually get the data it
> was looking for.
>
> I think the rationale for not aborting totally is that we have done
> significant work (including network traffic) during the clone, and the
> warning can generally be remedied with "git checkout the-right-branch".
> We could perhaps keep the repository but signal with a non-zero exit
> code.
>
> The other option for a script is not to use "-b", which only impacts
> checkout. Instead, you could do:
>
> $ git clone -n parent child &&
> cd child &&
> git checkout -b interesting-branch origin/interesting-branch
>
> which is just as efficient, but lets you react differently to failure of
> each part. You can also break it down further into:
>
> $ git init &&
> git remote add origin parent &&
> git fetch origin &&
> git branch interesting-branch origin/interesting-branch &&
> git checkout interesting-branch
>
> but I don't think there is much point in doing so.
>
> -Peff
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-11 14:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-11 4:11 command return values Brian Craft
2010-07-11 4:18 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-07-11 11:37 ` Jeff King
2010-07-11 14:53 ` Brian Craft
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).