* [FEATURE REQUEST] - extend git request-pull to send email
@ 2011-02-03 22:35 Eugene Sajine
2011-02-03 22:59 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Sajine @ 2011-02-03 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Hi,
The command "git request-pull" doesn't actually request anything but
just outputs a nice report about pending changes.
I would suggest to extend "git request-pull" to be able to send email
with the information generated by the command using "git send-mail"
functionality. By default it could take some values from the
environment, like the sender information, the subject and of course
the body of the message.
Specifying the "--to user@server.com" could be a trigger for this functionality.
All additional parameters from git send-mail should be available.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Eugene
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] - extend git request-pull to send email
2011-02-03 22:35 [FEATURE REQUEST] - extend git request-pull to send email Eugene Sajine
@ 2011-02-03 22:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-03 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-02-03 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eugene Sajine; +Cc: git
Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com> writes:
> Specifying the "--to user@server.com" could be a trigger for this functionality.
> All additional parameters from git send-mail should be available.
>
> What do you think?
Horrible ;-).
If this were not about request-pull but some other command that produces a
summary of recent changes you have, which you might want to distribute to
people who are involved in the project (e.g. Meta/cook), it might make
sense to have "generate and then e-mail" feature inside the command,
because such a command needs to inspect the history and grab various kinds
of information anyway, and adding "people involved" to the mix might make
sense.
But you are talking about request-pull, which is by design is meant to be
sent to a single recipient. If the user has to say --to user@example.com,
how is it different from piping the output to "| mail to@example.com"?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] - extend git request-pull to send email
2011-02-03 22:59 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2011-02-03 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-03 23:30 ` Eugene Sajine
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-02-03 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eugene Sajine; +Cc: git
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>> What do you think?
>
> Horrible ;-).
Just a quick note.
Please take this with a huge grain of salt, considering that the comment
is coming from somebody who thinks --compose and format-patch integration
to git-send-email was also a bad idea.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] - extend git request-pull to send email
2011-02-03 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2011-02-03 23:30 ` Eugene Sajine
2011-02-03 23:34 ` Eugene Sajine
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Sajine @ 2011-02-03 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> Horrible ;-).
>
> Just a quick note.
>
> Please take this with a huge grain of salt, considering that the comment
> is coming from somebody who thinks --compose and format-patch integration
> to git-send-email was also a bad idea.
>
;) Anyway thanks for prompt answer;))
Well, it is of course pretty cool that you can pipe the output to mail
but there are at least three problems that i currently see with this:
1. it is not cross-platform solution
2. By default subject gets empty;)
3. I probably would like the from address to be the one that I'm using
in git configuration...
Thanks,
Eugene
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] - extend git request-pull to send email
2011-02-03 23:30 ` Eugene Sajine
@ 2011-02-03 23:34 ` Eugene Sajine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Sajine @ 2011-02-03 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
> 3. I probably would like the from address to be the one that I'm using
> in git configuration...
It probably should be the reply-to....
Thanks,
Eugene
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-03 23:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-03 22:35 [FEATURE REQUEST] - extend git request-pull to send email Eugene Sajine
2011-02-03 22:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-03 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-03 23:30 ` Eugene Sajine
2011-02-03 23:34 ` Eugene Sajine
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).