From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avery Pennarun Subject: Re: Avery Pennarun's git-subtree? Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:33:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4C472B48.8050101@gmail.com> <4C4778DE.9090905@web.de> <20100722195653.GC4439@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Jakub Narebski , Jens Lehmann , Bryan Larsen , git , Junio C Hamano , Linus Torvalds To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0_Bjarmason?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 22 23:34:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oc3PM-0003lV-2I for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:34:24 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754572Ab0GVVeT convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:34:19 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:43858 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752967Ab0GVVeS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:34:18 -0400 Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so3955122wwj.1 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:34:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OTtQ5D6XQCiQntZH602+IHX8fwyx2gNG6eeZhAc6n5Y=; b=npecRU4QHCjQYdQAR4HEcq63m3uWfBpY4ndauUVHjZIfjTMNeanP513Qpq3nYgooRx rdtZfxEaoepbnPXgKZCREZcGLYPrw6K3ylRAVW0gwtBeM3sAVPf3cU0eP50UfoXncvzD QxwzVxfUa90G3zH62bSxDBNKBJdH0ru+B36PA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fUeSYp7+Jv5zQPeaFrl1ZtuoY/BkhbIK6etnNgVZmpBlMcMzb3VgyEGPEDpI+SkIhP JfupdcF9KIF8LWiGcJNhCnYaSySP5tDdhRJy+z6gfo7G9mWxPUdxe+rdCEg8u1ZrH6aj 5okY1ilZIbAQNV9/Oy9kiQVDQa1s1Wbf37gY4= Received: by 10.227.157.200 with SMTP id c8mr2549362wbx.69.1279834457222; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.235.202 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:33:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:17 PM, =C6var Arnfj=F6r=F0 Bjarmason wrote: > But it's also clear that we have a lot of tribal knowledge about the > lackings of git submodule / git subtree. It would be *really* useful > if people like Avery and Jens which have obviously thought hard about > the submodule/subtree issues would draft up some (calmly written) doc= s > about how the two differ (with comparison tables etc.). > > That'd be a very helpful resource for Git users in deciding which one > to use. I think I'm too biased to write that, but if someone else wants to take the lead, I could certainly contribute. Have fun, Avery