From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Hacky version of a glob() driven config include Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 18:58:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1273180440-8641-1-git-send-email-avarab@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eli Barzilay , Heiko Voigt , Junio C Hamano To: Bert Wesarg X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 07 20:58:58 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OASlF-0000pr-Pw for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 07 May 2010 20:58:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757863Ab0EGS6u convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2010 14:58:50 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]:57860 "EHLO mail-yx0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757780Ab0EGS6t convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2010 14:58:49 -0400 Received: by yxe1 with SMTP id 1so957983yxe.33 for ; Fri, 07 May 2010 11:58:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+yGIxYOHtBE7V6YYN3nI5rNwVK6I8w43Ag3+IUSsPvo=; b=mVTuZ+OwFeplVBkkIzhQzorSmrptrm/sj3gDmQk5Q4ohDZKdII9wmn/MZw+5oFAeBF TkGE5+J3vGtiAR6TjDhsNP6hUI0saLDz4EfVbphmNxKR/DUYJInj2Q8hhgNAvPPjMWge di4WcH9s0BEQKtkQhPhSsWggILonILPTymVCw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=k/7RLEE+V3K5d9gXpcegBu1krFgeA2WeRJtDI0rrf5OGz/EZLnLrAGHmUw7nVNAksI PbrZzz49fx2t/AN5cCvDBr53sGKYhhaL/VmBnpiSHZtEa2fVeuhtkcf+iu1CVHSfEWHr METo71/uAsxMVCe4IQszusY1quLq/db+nUaTY= Received: by 10.231.161.75 with SMTP id q11mr196757ibx.64.1273258727965; Fri, 07 May 2010 11:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.160.11 with HTTP; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:58:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 18:29, Bert Wesarg = wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 18:56, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason = wrote: >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 06:00, Bert Wesarg wrote: >>> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 23:14, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmaso= n wrote: >>>> >>>> Not-signed-off-by: =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason >>> >>> So you don't agree to the Developer's Certificate of Origin, don't = you? >> >> Signed-off-by is for "if you want your work included in git.git" >> (according to Documentation/SubmittingPatches). I don't think this >> patch is ready for inclusion as-is, but I wanted to solicit comments >> on the general approach. >> > > Can you please quote SubmittingPatches for your argumentation. I already did, but here's the full paragraph I quoted from, for reference: - if you want your work included in git.git, add a "Signed-off-by: Your Name " line to the commit message (or just use the option "-s" when committing) to confirm that you agree to the Developer's Certificate of Origin I'm not seeking to include this work as-is in Git, so I added a Not-signed-off-by line to make that clear (as if all the bugs didn't do that already). I do agree to the Developer's Certificate of Origin, but just read the "Not-signed-off-by" as "you really don't want to apply this in its current state". I'm asking for comments so that I can produce an appliable patch, that one will have a Signed-off-by line.