From: Antriksh Pany <antriksh.pany@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Need to change old commit (and regenerate tree)
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 20:17:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilTAknKPFv5AZBrwsITPsRlVSnsuX8TDXlUTWmw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all
My question is this: I have two branches (say B and C) where one is
reachable from the other (say B is ancestor of C), and if they are
separately rebased about/onto the same point, why do B and C become
non-overlapping branches?
Let me explain with an example.
Say I have the following commit line:
A--------o--------o--------o--------B--------o--------o--------C
A, B and C are branches (so that B is reachable from C, and A is
reachable from B). [For ease, I am drawing the branches at the same
level since there are no real diverging branches here.]
I then realise that I want to change the commit A and have both B and
C rebased on this changed commit.
Now when I do a
$ git rebase --onto A2 A C
This results in two parallel trees like these:
A--------o--------o--------o--------B--------o--------o--------o(old C)
A2--------o--------o--------o--------o--------o--------o--------C
Now I go about rebasing B. I can of course 'reset' B to C~3. But
alternatively, if I decide to do a rebase:
$ git rebase --onto A2 A B
I will end up getting
A--------o--------o--------o--------o(old B)--------o--------o--------o(old C)
A2--------o--------o--------o--------o--------o--------o--------C
\
` -----o--------o--------o--------B
Instead of (what I initially expected):
A--------o--------o--------o--------o(old B)--------o--------o--------o(old C)
A2--------o--------o--------o--------B--------o--------o--------C
So what I am missing here? Aren't the new commits B~1, B~2, B~3
identical to C~4, C~5, C~6 (respectively) in all ways so as to have
gotten them the same SHA1 and hence appear as what I expected them to
appear?
I have taken a simple example here. In reality, I wanted to change a
not so new commit (on the main line), and there were many branches
diverging out from the main line after the (bad) commit. I initially
thought I could just write a simple script that would rebase all
branches that have the bad commit as an ancestor, and the new tree
would be a mirror image of the original. But that was not to be! There
is also the problem of resetting tags (and possible notes).
I am sorry if this has already been discussed, please point me to the
right resource if so.
My git version:
$ git --version
git version 1.7.0.5
Thanks
Antriksh Pany
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-20 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-20 19:17 Antriksh Pany [this message]
2010-05-20 22:09 ` Need to change old commit (and regenerate tree) Andreas Schwab
2010-05-20 23:05 ` Jon Seymour
2010-05-21 18:18 ` Antriksh Pany
2010-05-21 5:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-05-21 21:46 ` Antriksh Pany
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTilTAknKPFv5AZBrwsITPsRlVSnsuX8TDXlUTWmw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=antriksh.pany@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).