Re: [PATCH 1/2] stash drops the stash even if creating the branch fails because it already exists

[Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>]

Junio,

Let me know if you want me to re-roll this series with Tomas'
sign-off. I can also add my simplification of the Brian's fix and
another fix I have made to have git stash save/create fail early in
case the index contains merge conflicts.

jon.

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Tomas Carnecky <tom@dbservice.com> wrote:
> On 9/28/10 3:19 PM, Jon Seymour wrote:
>> From: Tomas Carnecky <tom@dbservice.com>
>>
>> This bug was disovered by someone on IRC when he tried to 'git stash branch <branch> <stash>'
>> while <branch> already existed. In that case the stash is dropped even though it isn't
>> applied on any branch, so the stash is effectively lost. I think that shouldn't happen,
>> so here is a test.
>
> This line was missing from my original patch, sorry about that:
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky <tom@dbservice.com>
>
>> ---
>>  t/t3903-stash.sh |   11 +++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t3903-stash.sh b/t/t3903-stash.sh
>> index 9ed2396..0f6b2e4 100755
>> --- a/t/t3903-stash.sh
>> +++ b/t/t3903-stash.sh
>> @@ -545,4 +545,15 @@ test_expect_success 'invalid ref of the form stash@{n}, n >= N' '
>>       git stash drop
>>  '
>>
>> +test_expect_failure 'stash branch should not drop the stash if the branch exists' '
>> +     git stash clear &&
>> +     echo foo > file &&
>> +     git add file &&
>> +     git commit -m initial &&
>> +     echo bar > file &&
>> +     git stash &&
>> +     test_must_fail git stash branch master stash@{0} &&
>> +     git rev-parse stash@{0} --
>> +'
>> +
>>  test_done
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>