Re: object/pack size x5 larger than a fresh clone?

[Hin-Tak Leung <hintak.leung@gmail.com>]

On 7/26/10, Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> wrote:
> On 07/24/2010 11:57 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>> Is there any reason why a fresh git clone has a object pack around
>> 140MB but one that has been updated over the years has it over 700MB?
>> (even with git gc --aggressive --prune=now and git fsck?)
>>
>> $ du .git/objects/
>> 711364	.git/objects/pack
>>
>> $ du *wine/.git/objects/pack
>> 144692	git-wine/.git/objects/pack
>> 144604	wine/.git/objects/pack
>>
>> I had a problem with git fetch  "Cannot obtain needed object" from
>> wine's git repository (which seems to be something to do with http
>> proxy, although AFAIK I don't have one) since about 2 weeks ago which
>> obviously does not apply to anybody else as I would have heard from
>> wine-devel.
>>
>> Editing .git/config to switch from a http url to git url cure it...
>> but in the course of investigating, I git clone fresh (there are only
>> about 3 local changes so I could just git-format-patch them and move
>> them)
>>
>> http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git
>> git://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git
>>
>> and I am a bit surprised that the new clones are so much smaller than
>> the one I have been working on these last few years. (I have had the
>> old one for at least 3-4 years).
>
> To make a fair comparison, try
>   git repack -a -f -d && git prune --expire=now
>
> in your old repository. Be warned that this will remove all commits
> reachable from reflogs but not from branch heads or tags though.

I have tried as you said, and it has gone slightly worse -
$ du .git/objects/
741172	.git/objects/pack
16	.git/objects/info
741196	.git/objects/

However, I think I found one very big anormaly - in most of my git
clones (I have  ~20 projects I track) , .git/object/pack consists of
pairs of files like this:

pack-<sha1>.idx
pack-<sha1>. pack

with the occasional 3rd member, "pack-<sha1>. keep" . I did not look
before I did the above, but now the strange repository consists of one
such pair to about 147MB, which has a very new time stamp, but a lot
of singular pack-<sha1>.idx without a corresponding pack-<sha1>.pack ,
and some of them quite large, and many of them has  time stamps going
back to Mar 2008. I have got almost 500 of them, and they vary from
about 1.2k to 12MB, so it adds up to over 550MB.

So I guess these *.idx without a corresponding *.pack are safe to
delete? But git gc or one of the other house keeping commands should
get rid of them though, I think.

Should I file a bug etc for this? Thanks a lot any how.

Hin-Tak