From: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com>
To: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Cc: PJ Hyett <pjhyett@gmail.com>, Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>,
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>, git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Git sideband hook output
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:11:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimPI-A_4H-vYtHIyfbSLERDo0vu-kbB3Qu3ZT06@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B9F4351-4608-455E-B433-A5337A946F8A@wincent.com>
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com> wrote:
> El 11/06/2010, a las 16:34, PJ Hyett escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If its really a problem, maybe "remote: " prefix should turn into
>>>> something shorter and language agnostic, like "<< ". But thus far
>>>> we hadn't had to worry about it, since we didn't have translation
>>>> support in Git... (though yes, I see that is changing now).
>>>>
>>
>> I'm also in favor of making the default '>>' instead of 'remote:' if
>> nothing isn't an option.
>
> Funny, as '>>' is basically meaningless. At least 'remote:' has semantic value (ie. it indicates _where_ something is coming from).
>
How about '> ', which often means "quote" (e.g in e-mails)? Would that
be appropriate?
--
Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-11 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 20:32 Git sideband hook output Scott Chacon
2010-06-08 21:46 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2010-06-09 8:04 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2010-06-09 13:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-10 12:56 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2010-06-10 18:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-10 18:30 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2010-06-10 18:49 ` Scott Chacon
2010-06-11 14:34 ` PJ Hyett
2010-06-11 14:45 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2010-06-11 15:11 ` Erik Faye-Lund [this message]
2010-06-11 23:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-06-12 4:07 ` Jeff King
2010-06-11 21:54 ` A Large Angry SCM
2010-06-11 15:18 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-06-11 21:55 ` A Large Angry SCM
2010-06-09 6:10 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimPI-A_4H-vYtHIyfbSLERDo0vu-kbB3Qu3ZT06@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kusmabite@googlemail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kusmabite@gmail.com \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com \
--cc=pjhyett@gmail.com \
--cc=schacon@gmail.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=win@wincent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).