From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: When to use test_commit (Re: [PATCH] checkout: add a test for creating a new branch with regexp as a starting point)
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:20:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimeQA2_fQ_f2pQchbo1coj3=mV9TRPnbET8SQ4F@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100730191357.GA2448@burratino>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 19:13, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> And actually, we should probably have a
>> test_commit_notag() then.
>
> I don’t know. What’s so bad about using "git commit" directly?
Nothing, it's just easier to write and read the tests when we have and
use functions for these common operations.
> I often find myself using "git commit" in tests because test_commit
> imposes all the usual restrictions for a ref name on the commit
> message. I would happily use an abbreviation for
>
> test_tick &&
> git commit -m "something" &&
> git tag something-else
>
> if available because I don’t like typing, but would that help the
> reader and test runner any?
Maybe just introduce a fourth argument to test_commit, to make it
<message> [<file> [<contents> [<tagname>]] instead of <message>
[<file> [<contents>]] ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-30 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-29 22:01 [PATCH] checkout: add a test for creating a new branch with regexp as a starting point Dmitry V. Levin
2010-07-29 23:07 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-29 23:36 ` Thomas Rast
2010-07-30 8:44 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2010-07-30 11:54 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-30 19:13 ` When to use test_commit (Re: [PATCH] checkout: add a test for creating a new branch with regexp as a starting point) Jonathan Nieder
2010-07-30 20:20 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2010-07-31 0:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] test-lib.sh: introduce 4th argument to test_commit() specifying a tag name Dmitry V. Levin
2010-07-31 0:39 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-31 1:56 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Dmitry V. Levin
2010-07-31 10:23 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-31 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] checkout: add a test for creating a new branch with regexp as a starting point Dmitry V. Levin
2010-07-31 0:44 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-31 1:44 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Dmitry V. Levin
2010-07-31 10:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-08-05 21:24 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Dmitry V. Levin
2010-08-02 21:04 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTimeQA2_fQ_f2pQchbo1coj3=mV9TRPnbET8SQ4F@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).