From: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
To: GIT <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens.Lehmann@web.de
Subject: recurse_submodules vs recurse-submodules
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:59:31 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimppKC_CsN6hc4xGqtMBk8p2QEFjHYRWesKK8_r@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
Just noticed this in git 1.7.4
git clone -h
...
--recursive initialize submodules in the clone
--recurse_submodules initialize submodules in the clone
git fetch -h
...
--recurse-submodules control recursive fetching of submodules
The recurse_submodules option for git clone was added in ccdd3da6 I'm
guessing it wasn't Jens' intention to use an underscore instead of a
hypen. Also as it is fairly new it should be safe to correct without
worrying about retaining the incorrect option for backwards
compatibility.
Here's my attempt at a fix
----8<----
From 24c582c2c9bc4f66980679a20d3eb9de6a031071 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:31:06 +1300
Subject: [PATCH] clone: fixup recurse_submodules option
The recurse_submodules option was added in ccdd3da6 to bring 'git clone'
into line with 'git fetch' and future commands. The correct option should
have been "recurse-submodules".
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
---
builtin/clone.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/clone.c b/builtin/clone.c
index 61e0989..82a6938 100644
--- a/builtin/clone.c
+++ b/builtin/clone.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static struct option builtin_clone_options[] = {
"setup as shared repository"),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "recursive", &option_recursive,
"initialize submodules in the clone"),
- OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "recurse_submodules", &option_recursive,
+ OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "recurse-submodules", &option_recursive,
"initialize submodules in the clone"),
OPT_STRING(0, "template", &option_template, "path",
"path the template repository"),
--
1.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-10 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-10 22:59 Chris Packham [this message]
2011-02-11 1:54 ` recurse_submodules vs recurse-submodules Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimppKC_CsN6hc4xGqtMBk8p2QEFjHYRWesKK8_r@mail.gmail.com \
--to=judge.packham@gmail.com \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).