From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eugene Sajine Subject: Why the default action for pull is merge, but not rebase? Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:46:00 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 27 18:46:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PB98e-0005AX-85 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:46:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751977Ab0J0QqD (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:46:03 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:62839 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751924Ab0J0QqC (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:46:02 -0400 Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so534505gyg.19 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:46:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oSm/MgOCVsDglSPGUi8VOQ3Apm/3MDCwfNj0MKGvmHo=; b=hETbo/MNQDyE0xZOHbJ1A7jI7YLWV2wmtYRtycR/ziXtRh3DyfJ4cr/I76Yc5UNg8P icmnZrlKYCVbHgOdDCk4M0Ix2LrrQpi3BrR7ENDmS42IxUnMXlIqpB/GxL7BlynlhKmS bOMHwCeVocdKJJNrkHNGom3DfflzuKVLiFim4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Yjh7nA93K1NVF7A+cVSLGq4bJM+UDSlFqG4cl141FxqS27ZrvrP0SSoP+4ApRslMKE KZmOW2mPcNQ6HxpVw//wuCyMFNlm9xHtiAe1ypn+HRloVpvZiXWLgoDn8FBUFIeq15ri GZQjzhJ7dHc8oBDmYoFr7mMlNTapOcixydMPI= Received: by 10.204.98.84 with SMTP id p20mr7546570bkn.213.1288197960734; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.46.207 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, I'm just curious if there are some downsides that i don't see? For me it seems to have much more sense to automatically rebase vs merge when you do pull. The diverged history will become "straighter" and cleaner, if the history is not diverged then it will be fast-forward. So, why not to rebase? Thanks for your time in advance, Eugene