* Three-tiered VM development setup with support for branch switching
@ 2010-05-20 0:59 Burke Cates
2010-05-20 8:37 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Burke Cates @ 2010-05-20 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
I read Joe Maller's blog post "A web-focused Git workflow" (
http://joemaller.com/2008/11/25/a-web-focused-git-workflow/ ) and
thought this would be a great replacement for our current
scm/development workflow at my job, which I won't get into here. My
main concern with switching to a three-tiered setup using Git is that
switching branches on a workstation and pushing to the "hub" repo
would result in no change in the "prime" repo when "hub"'s post-update
hook runs, as it will not switch branches.
The only solution I can think of involves ripping the branch out of
the refspec that is passed to the hook and using that to call checkout
and pull (or possibly a checkout -b --track newbranch if I dont have
the branch locally on prime). I feel like this is a pretty nasty hack,
but I might be missing something completely that would make this sort
of setup much easier to pull off.
What I'm trying to pull off here is this: devs can code at their
workstations with whatever tools they want, and push changes to the
VM's with git. Hooks will be used to initiate makes for testing and
for pushing changes to other nodes in the test-cluster (who will have
the same make hook). The only obstacle at this point is the branch
switching.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Three-tiered VM development setup with support for branch switching
2010-05-20 0:59 Three-tiered VM development setup with support for branch switching Burke Cates
@ 2010-05-20 8:37 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason @ 2010-05-20 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burke Cates; +Cc: git
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 00:59, Burke Cates <burke.cates@gmail.com> wrote:
> The only solution I can think of involves ripping the branch out of
> the refspec that is passed to the hook and using that to call checkout
> and pull (or possibly a checkout -b --track newbranch if I dont have
> the branch locally on prime). I feel like this is a pretty nasty hack,
> but I might be missing something completely that would make this sort
> of setup much easier to pull off.
> What I'm trying to pull off here is this: devs can code at their
> workstations with whatever tools they want, and push changes to the
> VM's with git. Hooks will be used to initiate makes for testing and
> for pushing changes to other nodes in the test-cluster (who will have
> the same make hook). The only obstacle at this point is the branch
> switching.
If I'm not mistaken the plumbing commands like git-commit-tree allow
you to make commits without switching branches. I.e. they just record
raw data in the repository and don't care about your checkout.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-20 8:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-20 0:59 Three-tiered VM development setup with support for branch switching Burke Cates
2010-05-20 8:37 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).