From: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
To: jari <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Cc: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/config.txt: Order variables alphabetically
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:19:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTindMBh4dzo-VG2vPrKfgNZVUhs0-5AEU2fWChaC@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101201150917.GD6537@picasso.cante.net>
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:09 PM, jari <jari.aalto@cante.net> wrote:
> On 2010-12-01 15:57, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> | On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Jari Aalto wrote:
> | > The phone books have an index where to up information.
> | >
> | > - When you see script and it use VARIABLE, you look it from
> | > manual page
> |
> | Manpages (and 'git <cmd> --help') are displayed in pager, so you can
> | always search for option in a pager (e.g. '/' in 'less', the default
> | pager).
>
> Yuck, it's real fun start backward/forward ping-pong when you dont'
> know the directions and can't rely on standard A-Z index.
>
...but for config options, I tend to ping-pong between items that are
related to each other, which are already located close by. Your
argument weighs more for keeping the current layout, IMO.
> | > It is same as putting option in alphabetical order. See GNU cp(1),
> | > ssh(1) etc.
> |
> | In git documentation command line options are not in alphabetical order,
> | but grouped by functionality, therefore your argument is invalid.
>
> I see that only in pages that have tens and tens and tens of options..
>
> The problem is more the asciidoc's. Various bits and pices are
> "included" in place and make orderign the options impossile in some
> pages.
>
> Let's get all pages in shape with A-Z in this regard. That's a god
> quality goal.
>
I still haven't heard a compelling argument why alphabetical ordering
is better than logical ordering...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-01 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-01 13:12 [PATCH] Documentation/config.txt: Order variables alphabetically jari.aalto
2010-12-01 13:58 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-12-01 14:34 ` jari
[not found] ` <20101201142920.GB6537@picasso.cante.net>
2010-12-01 14:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-12-01 15:09 ` jari
2010-12-01 15:19 ` Erik Faye-Lund [this message]
2010-12-01 15:33 ` Jari Aalto
2010-12-01 15:37 ` Jari Aalto
2010-12-01 16:37 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-12-01 17:10 ` Jari Aalto
2010-12-01 18:03 ` Jeff King
2010-12-01 23:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-12-02 1:02 ` SZEDER Gábor
2010-12-02 5:43 ` Jari Aalto
2010-12-02 9:32 ` SZEDER Gábor
2010-12-02 5:46 ` Jari Aalto
2010-12-02 9:24 ` SZEDER Gábor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTindMBh4dzo-VG2vPrKfgNZVUhs0-5AEU2fWChaC@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kusmabite@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jari.aalto@cante.net \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).