From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Faye-Lund Subject: Re: git-archive and core.eol Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:11:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4D28683B.4020400@lsrfire.ath.cx> <4D29AF80.5060008@lsrfire.ath.cx> Reply-To: kusmabite@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Git Mailing List , msysGit , eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Scharfe?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 10 13:11:53 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PcGbH-000736-U0 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:11:52 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753868Ab1AJMLp convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:11:45 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:52706 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752349Ab1AJMLo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:11:44 -0500 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so18763063fxm.19 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 04:11:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/FAFdLD8KIbQpkZcX0rl+MkZS2+nQqWtDTLYq0k9fGU=; b=sWKcLQSnZLGtwB9usO9VP96TwOSH3kIjIcw3Z/hGSk+JtfT0eB33IbO8rOfKm7Lf7y 9iM53Suw6BDJHjjTDb2d2BRK+LQrygzsPKIwnlFtG++p6qaPOTMxjzExvt9QQoN4nDRt SCj4Pf/JzvfHYYEkiDShSWQa3bnFIi6tJAOFQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=c31Y9CW1A/YcRsd4Qrfnq4Lx+sQieXsZ/ZqqV/U27vBfOu5/imZ27AOjDjETXFf3wq ah7RKDNWZIPRCN0yLR6qtZrbOdBvDu0I9175OK10EEWAKB8Cn1jn1ZMzRMDiS3Yvpw1h KYs8xDJwakqLhUpuKiF9d+jw8hdvvTHop5rio= Received: by 10.223.112.1 with SMTP id u1mr5127546fap.109.1294661503245; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 04:11:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.79.3 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 04:11:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D29AF80.5060008@lsrfire.ath.cx> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Ren=E9 Scharfe wrote: > Am 08.01.2011 18:28, schrieb Erik Faye-Lund: >> Really? I haven't looked through what the test actually does (I'm ou= t >> sick right now, and don't have many working brain-cells), but every >> single test fails for me: > [...] >> $ git --version >> git version 1.7.4.rc1.3196.gfd693 >> >> (This is the current 'devel'-branch from >> git://repo.or.cz/git/mingw/4msysgit.git) > > I cloned it, but even though it reports a different version string fo= r > me we probably use the same (fd6937e0e6ccb78eb4347c427248e25c2d6739c8= ): > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0$ ./git version > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0git version 1.7.3.4.3902.gfd693 > This is probably just because you haven't pulled junio's repo recently, which contains the 1.7.4.rc1 tag. The tip is the same, indeed. > And all the tests succeed for me (on Windows Vista Home Premium x64) > with that one. > I'm on Vista 64 if that matters. And I'm using msysGit e59039e. > I'm especially interested in how the setup step manages to fail for y= ou. It's the line "git add .gitattributes" is the first that fails in 'setup'. Actually, all git-commands seems to fail. But now I also observe that just trying to run t0000-basic fails: $ ./t0000-basic.sh =2E/t0000-basic.sh: line 24: ../git: is a directory You do not seem to have built git yet. Now this is suspicious: $ ls ../git.exe =2E./git.exe* $ ls ../git Debug/ git.vcproj git.vcproj.Hue-PC.kusma.user git.wwdb Aha! The MSVC project generator creates a folder called 'git' at the root, so anything trying to execute '../git' fails! $ ../git help sh.exe": ../git: is a directory After deleting that folder, t0000-basic passes again. As does your test. So now I've got to figure out what is different between your test and mine. Perhaps I misdiagnosed to begin with?