From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Crane Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 0/2] Add -e/--exclude to git clean. Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:03:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jared Hance X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 20 19:04:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObGEb-0004yV-1m for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:04:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761417Ab0GTRD4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:03:56 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:39619 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761396Ab0GTRDz (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:03:55 -0400 Received: by bwz1 with SMTP id 1so3036305bwz.19 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.84.230 with SMTP id k38mr5348305bkl.160.1279645431829; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.100.16 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [87.194.157.167] In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4XPzsNFuDbS8QSigKD6AYgHlvOU Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jared Hance wrote: > This is the fourth round of patches for git clean -e. > Since this patch seems to be somewhat controversial, I've marked it as > PATCH/RFC. I would like some ideas on what to use for separators Rather than stuffing multiple exclusions into a single option, how about requiring one -e option per exclusion? git clean -e foo -e bar -- Aaron Crane ** http://aaroncrane.co.uk/