From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E967C433EF for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 19:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D3161181 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 19:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242779AbhJOTmk (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:42:40 -0400 Received: from mta-11-4.privateemail.com ([198.54.127.104]:49780 "EHLO MTA-11-4.privateemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242797AbhJOTmh (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:42:37 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 12389 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:42:37 EDT Received: from mta-11.privateemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta-11.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D059818000A2; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:40:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.46] (unknown [10.20.151.241]) by mta-11.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 56C7F18000A0; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:40:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:40:22 -0400 From: Hamza Mahfooz Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/3] grep: refactor next_match() and match_one_pattern() for external use To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20211015161356.3372-1-someguy@effective-light.com> X-Mailer: geary/40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 12:28:42 PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Usually people do not want to spam the list with a multi-patch > series when they have nothing new to show, unless there are other > reasons to do so, like "there is no change, but I am sending it > again because nobody seemed to have time reviewing the series the > last time", in which case that would make a good explanation to put > there. I made changes to other patches in the series however, (I only document the changes if that patch in particular has changed.)