From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] revert: Introduce HEAD, TODO files to persist state, plan
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:56:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=FkK=k6OavQtqMRvPCZ7nc+iKtwQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110526161102.GC24931@elie>
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Almost there. To comfort overly-worried people like me that think we
> have not finished converted all die() calls yet, wouldn't this need to
> look like
>
> persist_head(head);
> while ((commit = ...)) {
> int status_or_error;
>
> /*
> * Checkpoint. If do_pick_commit exits, make sure the user
> * can still use "git cherry-pick --continue" to recover.
> */
> persist_todo(revs.commits, opts);
>
> status_or_error = do_pick_commit(...);
> if (status_or_error)
> return status_or_error;
> }
>
> /* Success! */
> remove_todo(opts);
> remove_head();
> return 0;
You told me about this on IRC last night, but I forgot to squash the
relevant patch into this series. Thanks :)
> And with that, this would no longer depend on the (valuable enough on
> their own terms) patches 1 and 2 so they could be treated as a
> separate series, no?
Yes, but I'd like to keep 1 and 2 in this series, if that's alright.
Another series will have to take care of error handling more
extensively.
With a few tests, would it be useful to get this series merged in? It
implements '--abort', which is already useful.
-- Ram
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-26 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-25 14:16 [PATCH v3 00/10] Sequencer Foundations Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:16 ` [PATCH 01/10] advice: Introduce error_resolve_conflict Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:16 ` [PATCH 02/10] revert: Propogate errors upwards from do_pick_commit Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 22:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-26 9:34 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:16 ` [PATCH 03/10] revert: Eliminate global "commit" variable Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 23:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-25 14:16 ` [PATCH 04/10] revert: Rename no_replay to record_origin Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] revert: Introduce struct to keep command-line options Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] revert: Separate cmdline parsing from functional code Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] revert: Catch incompatible command-line options early Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] revert: Introduce HEAD, TODO files to persist state, plan Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] revert: Implement parsing --continue, --abort and --skip Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] revert: Implement --abort processing Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 23:15 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Sequencer Foundations Junio C Hamano
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 " Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 01/10] advice: Introduce error_resolve_conflict Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 02/10] revert: Propogate errors upwards from do_pick_commit Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 03/10] revert: Eliminate global "commit" variable Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] revert: Rename no_replay to record_origin Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 05/10] revert: Introduce struct to keep command-line options Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 06/10] revert: Separate cmdline parsing from functional code Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 07/10] revert: Catch incompatible command-line options early Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] revert: Introduce HEAD, TODO files to persist state, plan Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 16:11 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-26 16:26 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra [this message]
2011-05-26 17:05 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-01 15:28 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-01 19:31 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-02 12:53 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-02 14:29 ` Jeff King
2011-06-08 13:14 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] revert: Implement parsing --continue, --abort and --skip Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 10/10] revert: Implement --abort processing Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Sequencer Foundations Junio C Hamano
2011-05-27 7:22 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=FkK=k6OavQtqMRvPCZ7nc+iKtwQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).