From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] revert: Catch incompatible command-line options early
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 16:49:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik2t=qPfJe7JUsoeka79ZYYRmU_MA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110702100436.GB19090@elie>
Hi again,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> cherry-pick/revert: do not create a nonsense "struct opts" when given nonsense argv
>
> The --foo and --bar options make no sense together, but if I
> run "git cherry-pick --foo --bar" then parse_cherry_pick_option
> will return a nonsense struct with both "fooing" and "barring"
> set to true, which makes no sense. Currently it's not a
> problem since the code that cares is protected by a check:
>
> if (opts.fooing && opts.barring)
> die("cannot foo and bar at the same time");
>
> But that is very fragile --- the frob() code-path relies on
> opts.fooing and opts.barring not both being true without such
> a check and it's only a coincidence that futz() is called
> first and makes that check, protecting it.
>
> We can make sure such a nonsensical options struct is never
> created by checking right away that --foo and --bar are not
> passed together at option-parsing time. Meanwhile, make sure
> regressions in maintaining this invariant are caught in the
> future by adding an assertion "assert(!opts->fooing ||
> !opts->barring)" to both frob() and futz().
>
> The discussion above also applies to --bar and --qux. Fix
> that, too.
Thanks! I wish I could write commit messages like this. I hope I've
got it right this time:
revert: Don't create invalid replay_opts in parse_args
The "--ff" command-line option cannot be used with four other
command-line options. However, when these options are specified with
"--ff" on the command-line, parse_args will still parse these
incompatible options into a replay_opts structure for use by the rest
of the program. Although pick_commits checks the validity of the
replay_opts strucutre before before starting its operation, this is
fragile design because the validity of the replay_opts structure
depends on pick_commits being called before anything else. Change
this so that an invalid replay_opts structure is not created by
parse_args in the first place, and make sure regressions in
maintaining this invariant are caught in the future by adding an
assertion in pick_commits.
And yes, adding an "assert" statement in pick_commits does seem like a
great reminder for the future :)
-- Ram
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-02 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 13:04 [PATCH 00/13] Sequencer with continuation features Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 01/13] advice: Introduce error_resolve_conflict Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 15:55 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 18:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-02 9:44 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-02 10:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 02/13] revert: Factor out add_message_to_msg function Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 15:58 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 19:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 03/13] revert: Don't check lone argument in get_encoding Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 16:03 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 04/13] revert: Propogate errors upwards from do_pick_commit Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 16:22 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 19:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-21 19:32 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 20:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-02 10:31 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 05/13] revert: Eliminate global "commit" variable Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 16:52 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 19:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 06/13] revert: Rename no_replay to record_origin Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 07/13] revert: Introduce struct to keep command-line options Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 16:58 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 19:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 08/13] revert: Separate cmdline parsing from functional code Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 17:00 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 09/13] revert: Catch incompatible command-line options early Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 17:04 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-02 9:47 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-02 9:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-02 10:04 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-02 11:19 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra [this message]
2011-07-02 11:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-02 20:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 10/13] revert: Persist data for continuation Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 17:11 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 11/13] revert: Introduce a layer of indirection over pick_commits Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH 12/13] revert: Introduce skip-all to cleanup sequencer data Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 20:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-02 6:24 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-04 4:59 ` Miles Bader
2011-07-05 10:47 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] revert: Introduce --continue to continue the operation Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-21 17:19 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-21 15:48 ` [PATCH 00/13] Sequencer with continuation features Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTik2t=qPfJe7JUsoeka79ZYYRmU_MA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).