From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: Merge made by recursive? Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 23:12:28 +0530 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Shawn Ligocki X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 25 19:42:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QPI6g-0000D2-Cx for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:42:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752499Ab1EYRmt (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 13:42:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:64376 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752377Ab1EYRmt (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 13:42:49 -0400 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so3691599wwk.1 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 10:42:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=tNnVtPA6LUfkHXKafIKGKeC9SNS+0DgI1C7iVPxEKzI=; b=eBt9hH5Nf7TLYZzKcH8XsKumCa+XDUOCCyicirSFxkq0RD6El2voJeeOtZAm7D6Qsj fFwg0IfC1mNfTqzeAbE3nxHM9aMNHFR2sg29UUgF/qadoG9kyjKdh7ZLBjIV5suXXEie JKYTmr8zEKYNXUyC8o6RPBIB6yQm9EQRdFyZw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=mvahdX2okUFcBpILEQdSYCGzsM9bsQZABvAwXEk1+HQXin5/qbIGCroREQTLTLIJv5 Q9bImZBNOPdQjAJn8RhhuGFqgtJzL22ugs90+LcV2Zd0v7A/Wh6hEx+9ESUWWUhOBCTk uXEm0OGYn6/+Hp0UkBxSZjx09N+HKVdSifLSw= Received: by 10.216.255.201 with SMTP id j51mr4602907wes.94.1306345368211; Wed, 25 May 2011 10:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.158.70 with HTTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 10:42:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Shawn, Shawn Ligocki writes: > Is this intentionally bad grammar? Every time I see it, I cringe a little. What > does it even mean? That it merged incrementally through each subsequent revision? I suppose it's yet another quirk I've got used to -- "recursive" refers to the merge strategy that was used; see git-merge(1). We can definitely make the Porcelain say something nicer like `merged successfully using "recursive" merge strategy`. Patches are welcome: see Documentation/SubmittingPatches :) -- Ram