From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francis Moreau Subject: rebasing branch with reverted patches Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:32:37 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 19 09:32:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QC5QT-0002Az-NY for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:32:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751921Ab1DSHcj (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:32:39 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:51687 "EHLO mail-px0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750795Ab1DSHci (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:32:38 -0400 Received: by pxi2 with SMTP id 2so4245368pxi.10 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:32:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=wurBFGwg492CVkG3zTwP/vxny/+NopESm+JS01JM2aM=; b=ZB7BjM5YdjBMalBlKf7iQK8gpx91L01+VxrGNeb+ar/pzlG0dBMkduW+VnlJ4wExNR MowG57J49Fr+8OXLC/p63LTyJpVvLVsBcApPPabVzxvxUxlBzZE6tV/Babm0BJOzv2IJ 0/Kd/snlhsqEnVED4GcXMBgJG96J0xJygcBmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=eNwtUZs5TW+p9pwGOePeAcJb6PRv8vVhJHZikcrUvtVqjq/PkZ1VcqM+Eq1pD599Ke F2iFhtihltnHhcisIhUJaIBPpBeQacyfnKxwtBDmcECC1GfhLKJUFSx0+R6AH5KKpt// RSZM6YeWbKoUJfzhby/KqpNJT9tPgHqAsgg+k= Received: by 10.142.249.39 with SMTP id w39mr3232410wfh.96.1303198357591; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.18.11 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hello, I'm wondering if it would be a good idea for git rebase to allow not rebasing reverted patch which are part of the rebased branch. For example I'm currently rebasing my branch 'devel' onto master. This branch have several commits and specially one called A and another one called A' which reverts A. When rebasing 'devel' branch, rebase could try to drop both A and A'. What do you think ? BTW is there a way to do this currently ? Thanks -- Francis