From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jay Soffian Subject: Re: Separate default remotes for pulling and pushing Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 08:47:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1FDDE878-C81A-4318-836B-7F8BED51A981@gmail.com> <20110509081708.GA5871@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7viptjq0ua.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110509220459.GA3719@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Sverre Rabbelier , David Lee , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 10 14:48:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJmMX-0000OZ-HP for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:48:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753617Ab1EJMsY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 08:48:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:37243 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752930Ab1EJMsX (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 08:48:23 -0400 Received: by pvg12 with SMTP id 12so2804819pvg.19 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:48:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=fhFzKewsDtBugYIrU0EDHDCPsWWVnzs/AbNVm+wh6E0=; b=vW4bh3/NXbN0Oawva44413Vh9oo7PBYJ6vN6CDYaZK7bAPNi2QMRVAlQ4ZpLqFY/QG +//ZvtKP2+7kw/5P/Ry2e23RN8IxohJvBLJpNX5pEDnfTk9N2548WKSZuO2F9SS6+Qox Gv0SIRIDHu1fWl4GSxeNnXkOEsMLV7oM6t/eE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=fc+1OwstUbAZ5/iGVGQd05YIdTmT9cgxyJq1Y2hRsMDqdag7CzweIWQhjhwbkGGASH 3kp+ZbQ1D1vNCq/DYpo3XoK2l++scn5N/6oKPeGtDFZssKrr7vjC1fIEYS9mgIXOJWTg 0G35gWnJznqlTAwvr5Ez3UfLH6Gi1va5YbrQE= Received: by 10.142.135.8 with SMTP id i8mr3909757wfd.29.1305031703074; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.211.14 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:47:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110509220459.GA3719@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jeff King wrote: > I think it is important to note that calling them both "origin" is > definitely the wrong thing. The proposal is instead that "git push" > without a remote would default to something besides "origin". For people > who publish multiple places, it might even make sense for it to be an > iterative push to each place. While developing in a particular repo, I constantly have to push to two compile machines. I just dropped a Makefile into the top of my working tree: all: push amend: git amend -a git --no-pager diff @{1} make push push: make -j 2 mac win mac: git push mac win: git push win j.