From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sverre Rabbelier Subject: Re: git rebase --interactive commits order Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:30:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Philippe Vaucher X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 11 00:31:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJvSo-0006cZ-Sd for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:31:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752911Ab1EJWb2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 18:31:28 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:50353 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752871Ab1EJWb1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 18:31:27 -0400 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so3938987qwk.19 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:31:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=zD/1cFAZUsAdPiKprDoo3VlZ8G/2DLVHrAa6idlQkj8=; b=EyErWjUkjPfX79muk7v5oUhGnlGk3KESfU85XKQQzRlCzWLjCO2FVCNdhnMVs5g+t9 CLVt0pgP8XhqfWy45YbkKSmd8X8TnDBdU/Aq3+6kTKxe9th7aF9UtTiATjd6NfUdQv/w UjcwagXVSVrFT6wscJKlFwUq2fqDPLHjY+CZ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=JbZLryi6ktz3WnaYXTVvCFGebPk+0jPLpn/A6mn8BzvumdcQKijhs0qr+JE0bPvR1l P8LqUbfjK/wfPTyXDh3+IcyV+Xoms9zLfL+BtDX4gqcxdIY5FU8ePW8bUZsveyYVgZtx 67Djlqn0BJqXKBv2CEcW9Pd+sSKf1R/uz08GI= Received: by 10.224.207.131 with SMTP id fy3mr7193381qab.89.1305066687232; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.229.5 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:30:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Heya, On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 00:20, Philippe Vaucher wrote: > So, sounds like most people agree with me. What should we do for this > to happen? propose a patch? Yes, write a patch that adds a --reverse flag, off by default, (or something like that), possibly with a config flag. -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier