From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] revert: Introduce HEAD, TODO files to persist state, plan
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:23:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinc=9aW_y6s-Zb578QsMawnxFD55Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110601193126.GC9730@elie>
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> . If no, the "todo list" needs to be fully resolved to start out, and
> then the cherry-pick loop can just walk through it. In git API
> terms, that means first populating the commit_list (for example
> using a loop that gets revisions and inserts them at the end of a
> commit_list, or by preparing the revision walk with "limited" flag
> set), then walking through it with commit_list APIs.
Thanks. I picked this approach :)
On a slightly unrelated note, I just found out that the persist_todo
can't be called twice due to a lockfile API limitation* -- the
atexit(3) cleanup handler is supposed to have a linked list of
lockfiles to clean up. When one lockfile is used twice, it becomes a
circularly linked list, and the entire program hangs at exit time
since traversing a circularly linked list is never-ending. Couple of
comments:
1. By reading the lockfile implementation, I understand why this
happens -- can't it be implemented differently to remove this
limitation? If not, shouldn't this limitation be documented somewhere?
2. What can I do? It'll be inelegant to use the lockfile API while
persisting the first time, but not the second time -- is there any way
out of this?
Thanks again.
* You brought this up during one of our IRC conversations, but I
didn't understand it then. I do now.
-- Ram
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-25 14:16 [PATCH v3 00/10] Sequencer Foundations Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:16 ` [PATCH 01/10] advice: Introduce error_resolve_conflict Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:16 ` [PATCH 02/10] revert: Propogate errors upwards from do_pick_commit Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 22:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-26 9:34 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:16 ` [PATCH 03/10] revert: Eliminate global "commit" variable Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 23:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-25 14:16 ` [PATCH 04/10] revert: Rename no_replay to record_origin Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] revert: Introduce struct to keep command-line options Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] revert: Separate cmdline parsing from functional code Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] revert: Catch incompatible command-line options early Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] revert: Introduce HEAD, TODO files to persist state, plan Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] revert: Implement parsing --continue, --abort and --skip Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] revert: Implement --abort processing Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-25 23:15 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Sequencer Foundations Junio C Hamano
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 " Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 01/10] advice: Introduce error_resolve_conflict Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 02/10] revert: Propogate errors upwards from do_pick_commit Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 03/10] revert: Eliminate global "commit" variable Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] revert: Rename no_replay to record_origin Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 05/10] revert: Introduce struct to keep command-line options Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 06/10] revert: Separate cmdline parsing from functional code Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 07/10] revert: Catch incompatible command-line options early Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] revert: Introduce HEAD, TODO files to persist state, plan Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 16:11 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-26 16:26 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 17:05 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-01 15:28 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-06-01 19:31 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-06-02 12:53 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra [this message]
2011-06-02 14:29 ` Jeff King
2011-06-08 13:14 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] revert: Implement parsing --continue, --abort and --skip Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 10/10] revert: Implement --abort processing Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-26 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Sequencer Foundations Junio C Hamano
2011-05-27 7:22 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTinc=9aW_y6s-Zb578QsMawnxFD55Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).