From: Rei Thiessen <rei.thiessen@gmail.com>
To: "Christof Krüger" <git@christof-krueger.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cygwin: set write permission before unlink
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:48:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTincfBvDBYYLGJe-m5hknvCVdmMUww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09c0b1900a67bd1f701c0b23954a34ab.squirrel@mail.localhost.li>
Another point of concern is that the user might have specifically set
the read-only flag only certain files
to protect them from changes/deletion, but after the patch, git can
delete them with impunity.
But then, a file's permission isn't supposed to matter to unlink() anyways.
Interestingly, Cygwin's packaged unlink command-line utility will
delete read-only files,
so Cygwin's attempt to fake permissions through the read-only flag
when a filesystem is mounted with "noacl"
seems to be inconsistent.
I'll leave this issue up to Cygwin's package maintainer for git.
Regards,
Rei
2011/6/29 Christof Krüger <git@christof-krueger.de>:
>> +#undef unlink
>> +int cygwin_unlink(const char *pathname)
>> +{
>> + /* "read-only" files can't be unlinked */
>> + chmod(pathname, 0666);
>> + return unlink(pathname);
>> +}
>
> I've no idea on how cygwin maps file permissions to the underlying
> filesystem, but the above raised my attention. Doesn't chmodding the file
> to 0666 open a small windows where "group" and "other" users have read
> access to the file? This might be unwanted by the user and could be
> exploited by some attacker listening for changes on that file.
> Or am I too paranoid?
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-29 7:18 [PATCH] cygwin: set write permission before unlink Rei Thiessen
2011-06-29 14:31 ` Christof Krüger
2011-06-29 18:48 ` Rei Thiessen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTincfBvDBYYLGJe-m5hknvCVdmMUww@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rei.thiessen@gmail.com \
--cc=git@christof-krueger.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).