From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: diffstat summary mode change bug
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:02:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxwNOLaoeg64CYb-a6c89ceVbfc0b5vG_WCzyNBwynwfQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kZF5w7ucbUCKJAuAbz2KBoMJjWneAxFcjOPeted8SBNmg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
>
> I disagree with this analysis, as the fix you propose adds the
> new line unconditionally, i.e. this code path would be broken
> regardless of "show filename or not".
Right. Because it is what we want.
The old code (before that commit) used to have two different cases:
fprintf(file, "%s mode change %06o => %06o%c",
line_prefix, p->one->mode,
p->two->mode, show_name ? ' ' : '\n');
ie if "show_name" was set, it would *not* print a newline, and print a
space instead.
But then on the very next line, it used to do:
if (show_name) {
write_name_quoted(p->two->path, file, '\n');
ie now it prints the filename, and then prints the newline.
End result: it used to *always* print the newline. Either it printed
it at the end of the mode (for the non-show_name case), or it printed
it at the end of the filename (for the show_name case).
Your patch removed the '\n' entirely.
My patch makes it unconditional, which it was before your patch (it
was "conditional" only in where it was printed, not _whether_ it was
printed).
> I wonder why our tests failed to tell us about this.
>
> Specifically we have t4100/t-apply-4.expect
> mode change 100644 => 100755 t/t0000-basic.sh
> mode change 100644 => 100755 t/test-lib.sh
> which would seem to exercise this code path.
That only tests "git apply --stat --summary".
It doesn't test "git diff" at all.
And the "mode change" printout is entirely different code (see apply.c
vs diff.c).
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-27 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-27 18:15 diffstat summary mode change bug Linus Torvalds
2017-09-27 20:40 ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-27 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2017-09-27 21:09 ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-27 21:58 ` [PATCH] diff: correct newline in summary for renamed files Stefan Beller
2017-09-27 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-27 22:09 ` Jeff King
2017-09-27 22:32 ` Jeff King
2017-09-27 22:39 ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-27 22:49 ` Jeff King
2017-09-27 22:51 ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-27 23:15 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-09-27 23:49 ` Ramsay Jones
2017-09-27 23:57 ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-28 0:39 ` Jeff King
2017-09-28 4:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-09-28 0:35 ` Jeff King
2017-09-27 22:34 ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-28 4:12 ` diffstat summary mode change bug Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+55aFxwNOLaoeg64CYb-a6c89ceVbfc0b5vG_WCzyNBwynwfQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).