From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C361F428 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 00:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751034AbeACACp (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 19:02:45 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]:47073 "EHLO mail-vk0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751018AbeACACo (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 19:02:44 -0500 Received: by mail-vk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id m15so32516vkf.13 for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:02:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XB9eOImMkYrabIVCadYtbqO9hRfmxytFm0azF0xgclg=; b=JvuPFGPiWqYdxIIxR+Nm0qdPUYlleOzE0qlZk3uQ7Y2MiqKQPTeo+vMELUp/0B9A56 cE2cYPn1cqYYu8UE4p+0chl9pA9IVAQ+eTnZfutSWZWGjcZPrli9mEyW5JuF4pQjSy7O 5DpTu0P5oyaXWUPpGmEKktleqYWpyXOI9rNTLYCIHRWijmPiOqePO3aNQV5FkMv0IQdL RvvYH8OqpbQ8FJOifT9qL08uNUuBaW/BNeVPZYeCKHFbupUDcPDLUboMpHnMmCInH+d5 XM5WxMl+bMXASwf/wfRq6j+d2nCETLDucShkunLZK2mWaveXkIEmXz7NoW55YtIBHEsc 60bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XB9eOImMkYrabIVCadYtbqO9hRfmxytFm0azF0xgclg=; b=pPxm6foXEnfPHF3hay7+OEKfuHqsEoJseCpYlP6CJtEg/Y9iB+hUJS9XsD+M5N2KdJ OBuWu2Vm37OiBXRpAmmDtBJ5GeASn9618YdQqJIKR5Sej8hqwCKEnx7N9QmA6DHgtEv9 z5YX9eH8yu4sWe1XYDxyVyPym64C7FjNHgnYGGdhJ3d/qcwtamBxO6SOTzSlnlUDy1GC tqLd7GqCq1UUoeyhf8SKBvEnyBEmA2vJWRncIhq1qgwX4IC4xAZMpRv7rbi/TJZTgT7t KCyKrHNpvSuZVzAfKGfIM4YbgkH2R4XzLJxXoZ++j2qdVZYvGzqboPcAM/l0/hwNhWJp Zsjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJ1y2GlntNm8nMB3dSAYrY/r2TTpbrvzaZTcJOO/EToJZeb8zmM k8Vb/l8oKb4Rwqwn17JOzWRobz+RhZKy7PJN5CAODg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou8j7E41gKijTyqbFEufsQskPij2s4rzZ6/zkEGVGIABsG7XJFeGmNW6oOhg91JzRDg5MJ3fACp1m439Zb4DSg= X-Received: by 10.31.150.79 with SMTP id y76mr40249301vkd.183.1514937763901; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:02:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.82.5 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:02:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171228041352.27880-1-newren@gmail.com> References: <20171228041352.27880-1-newren@gmail.com> From: Elijah Newren Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:02:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/34] Add directory rename detection to git To: Git Mailing List Cc: Stefan Beller , Jonathan Nieder , Matthieu Moy , Jeff King Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Elijah Newren wrote: > This patchset introduces directory rename detection to merge-recursive. See > https://public-inbox.org/git/20171110190550.27059-1-newren@gmail.com/ > for the first series (including design considerations, etc.), and follow-up > series can be found at > https://public-inbox.org/git/20171120220209.15111-1-newren@gmail.com/ > https://public-inbox.org/git/20171121080059.32304-1-newren@gmail.com/ > https://public-inbox.org/git/20171129014237.32570-1-newren@gmail.com/ > > Changes since v4: > * Squashed Junio's GETTEXT_POISON fixes into the appropriate commits As per Jonathan's request[1], shamelessly re-sending Stefan's request for further review. :-) Quoting Stefan: "I have reviewed the first three patches (which could form an independent series) that it would warrant a Reviewed-By: Stefan Beller While I reviewed the earlier versions of the later patches, I would prefer if there is another reviewer for these as it seems like a bigger contribution at a core functionality. I cc'd some people who were active in some form of rename detection work earlier; could you review this series, please?" My note: Stefan also looked through the testcases pretty closely and even suggested additional tests, which would account for another 11 patches or so, but extra eyes on any part of the series always welcome. Thanks! Elijah [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180102221916.GE131371@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com/