From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Tony Tung via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Tony Tung <tonytung@merly.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sequencer: remove use of comment character
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 23:20:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABPp-BFY7m_g+sT131_Ubxqo5FsHGKOPMng7=90_0-+xCS9NEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqcywv4ar2.fsf@gitster.g>
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 10:33 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> > Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> I thought the point of the comment_line_char was so that commit
> >> messages could have lines starting with '#'. That rationale doesn't
> >> apply to the TODO list generation or parsing, and I'm not sure if we
> >> want to add the same complexity there.
>
> Earlier I said
>
> > Thanks for a healthy dose of sanity. I noticed existing use of
> > comment_line_char everywhere in sequencer.c and assumed we would
> > want to be consistent, but you are right to point out that they are
> > all about the COMMIT_EDITMSG kind of thing, and not about what
> > appears in "sequencer/todo".
>
> but with something as simple as
>
> $ git -c core.commentchar='@' rebase -i master seen^2
>
> I can see that the references to comment_line_char in sequencer.c
> are about the commented lines after the list of insn in the
> generated sequencer/todo file, so even though the rationale does not
> apply, isn't this already "broken" in the current code anyway?
Yes, I believe it is. However, I remember specifically looking at
cases with --rebase-merges about a year and a half ago, and noted that
there was a mixture of hardcoded '#' references along with
comment_line_char. I noted at the time that changing
comment_line_char looked like it had a bug, and that the parsing in
particular would be fooled and do wrong things if it changed.
Unfortunately, I can't find any notes from the time with the details,
so I don't remember exactly what or how it was triggered.
However, I do suspect that the references to comment_line_char in the
`rebase -i` codepaths was not for any actual intended purpose, but
just noting that they were used elsewhere in the file (for
COMMIT_EDITMSG, where it made sense) and just mimicking that code
without realizing the lack of rationale. That would have been mere
wasted effort had the comment_line_char been consistently supported in
the TODO file editing and parsing, but it wasn't, which left TODO
editing & parsing somewhat broken.
I think supporting comment_line_char for the TODO file provides no
value, and I think the easier fix would be undoing the uses of
comment_line_char relative to the TODO file (perhaps also leaving
in-code comments to the effect that comment_line_char just doesn't
apply to the TODO file).
However, if someone prefers to make the TODO file also respect
comment_line_char, despite its dubious value, then I expect any patch
should
1) audit *every* reference found via git grep -e '".*#' -e "'#'" sequencer.c
2) add a test case (or cases) involving --rebase-merges -i that
trigger the relevant code paths
If they don't do that, then I fear we might make the bug more likely
to be triggered rather than less.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-31 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-30 3:08 [PATCH] sequencer: remove use of comment character Tony Tung via GitGitGadget
2023-10-30 4:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-30 17:26 ` Elijah Newren
2023-10-30 23:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-31 4:42 ` Tony Tung
2023-10-31 4:50 ` Tony Tung
2023-10-31 5:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-31 6:20 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2023-10-31 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] sequencer: remove use of hardcoded comment char Tony Tung via GitGitGadget
2023-10-31 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sequencer: remove use of comment character Tony Tung via GitGitGadget
2023-10-31 11:43 ` Phillip Wood
2023-11-01 4:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-31 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sequencer: fix remaining hardcoded comment char Tony Tung via GitGitGadget
2023-10-31 11:27 ` Phillip Wood
2023-10-31 6:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] sequencer: remove use of " Elijah Newren
2023-10-31 11:18 ` Phillip Wood
2023-11-01 0:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-11-01 0:21 ` Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABPp-BFY7m_g+sT131_Ubxqo5FsHGKOPMng7=90_0-+xCS9NEQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=tonytung@merly.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).