From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] log: --remerge-diff needs to keep around commit parents
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 07:47:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABPp-BHauuserYU8t5ybn+ghqRb-c85qwwjLWVe-e5EC8sVVxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1825.git.1731073435641.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 5:43 AM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
>
> To show a remerge diff, the merge needs to be recreated. For that to
> work, the merge base(s) need to be found, which means that the commits'
> parents have to be traversed until common ancestors are found (if any).
>
> However, one optimization that hails all the way back to
> cb115748ec0d (Some more memory leak avoidance, 2006-06-17) is to release
> the commit's list of parents immediately after showing it. This can break
> the merge base computation.
>
> Note that it matters more clearly when traversing the commits in
> reverse: In that instance, if a parent of a merge commit has been shown
> as part of the `git log` command, by the time the merge commit's diff
> needs to be computed, that parent commit's list of parent commits will
> have been set to `NULL` and as a result no merge base will be found.
>
> Let's fix this by special-casing the `remerge_diff` mode, similar to
> what we did with reflogs in f35650dff6a4 (log: do not free parents when
> walking reflog, 2017-07-07).
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
> log: --remerge-diff needs to keep around commit parents
>
> This fixes a bug that is pretty much as old as the remerge-diff
> machinery itself. I noticed it while writing my reply to Hannes Sixt's
> concerns about my range-diff --diff-merges=<mode> patch
> (https://lore.kernel.org/git/af576487-5de2-fba3-b341-3c082322c9ec@gmx.de/).
>
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1825%2Fdscho%2Flog-remerge-diff-needs-commit-parents-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1825/dscho/log-remerge-diff-needs-commit-parents-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1825
>
> builtin/log.c | 2 +-
> t/t4069-remerge-diff.sh | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
> index c0a8bb95e98..a297c6caf59 100644
> --- a/builtin/log.c
> +++ b/builtin/log.c
> @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static int cmd_log_walk_no_free(struct rev_info *rev)
> * but we didn't actually show the commit.
> */
> rev->max_count++;
> - if (!rev->reflog_info) {
> + if (!rev->reflog_info && !rev->remerge_diff) {
> /*
> * We may show a given commit multiple times when
> * walking the reflogs.
Should this comment be updated to reflect the expanded rationale for
this block's purpose?
> diff --git a/t/t4069-remerge-diff.sh b/t/t4069-remerge-diff.sh
> index 07323ebafe0..a68c6bfa036 100755
> --- a/t/t4069-remerge-diff.sh
> +++ b/t/t4069-remerge-diff.sh
> @@ -317,4 +317,11 @@ test_expect_success 'remerge-diff turns off history simplification' '
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'remerge-diff with --reverse' '
> + git log -1 --remerge-diff --oneline ab_resolution^ >expect &&
> + git log -1 --remerge-diff --oneline ab_resolution >>expect &&
> + git log -2 --remerge-diff --oneline ab_resolution --reverse >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
> test_done
>
> base-commit: bea9ecd24b0c3bf06cab4a851694fe09e7e51408
> --
> gitgitgadget
Wow, nice find, and I appreciate the nice simple testcase
demonstrating what had been the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-08 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 13:43 [PATCH] log: --remerge-diff needs to keep around commit parents Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-11-08 15:47 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2024-11-11 1:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-11 1:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-11 18:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-11-11 22:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-12-12 10:29 ` [PATCH v3] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-12-13 15:02 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABPp-BHauuserYU8t5ybn+ghqRb-c85qwwjLWVe-e5EC8sVVxQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).