* [RFC] Relaxing interpret-trailers' interpretation rules
@ 2019-08-20 2:13 Phil Hord
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Phil Hord @ 2019-08-20 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git; +Cc: Christian Couder
I'm trying to include "Bug" numbers from commit messages in my
one-line log output, like this:
git log --pretty="%h %(trailers:key=Bug,valueonly,separator=;) %s"
But I have a problem. We have a tool that appends a trailer to commit
messages like this:
Reviewed at https://reviews.myco.com/012345
Unfortunately, it adds a newline before this line, effectively making
'git interpret-trailers' think there are no other trailers.
foo: add new feature foo
yadda yadda yadda
Bug: PROJ-155485
Testing: https://jenkins/job/foo-functional/1/console
Reviewed at https://reviews.myco.com/012345
I could fix this going forward, but it doesn't help with my existing
project and various users' similar formats.
I'm thinking of adding a switch to interpret-trailers to tell it not
to stop searching for my trailer key at the last blank line in the
message. This feels like it will cheapen the purpose of
interpret-trailers, though.
Do you have thoughts on this idea?
Another option I considered is adding some extension to --pretty's
format to let me post-process fields in a command. I don't think such
a thing already exists, but with the myriad log formats available,
maybe I've overlooked something.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-08-20 2:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-20 2:13 [RFC] Relaxing interpret-trailers' interpretation rules Phil Hord
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).