From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A228E1FAA8 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 17:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753002AbdEPRut (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2017 13:50:49 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:34991 "EHLO mail-it0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752954AbdEPRus (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2017 13:50:48 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id c15so66984900ith.0 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 10:50:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LpnbIaonugYzIakx+Lh/zS3IoHUZUa82k25u5CnbiLw=; b=kYApMIXHEUi05mTEZoqaVsMY7u2yxkJXRrPNsv4h1F2HhOOqjxsRfmvKePyw1z0jl+ 64lb0I9Nm7Y6nmoMXcNDdJ2zHopeQS6HiBYGjO/yH2Noq/c6PbAAn3G782ofRLQPbBSG Zrcsxlmj1yH7HN1P22XtzbDvbAgNAYgYLvHATDiDfhWQH7q+OAlY22a2qQ1h9T93dCHk o8fqBBv/86kaU6IF2tVgcG8R7zqkyGPYLmK2uyyIWEkwKt9QkEXjmzjOPlraTltm/PGz nXbpNXU3+Nj2WaPxpS8J+509ZPLBAwKJlSelO5S8RES1R4oHjYb0wT9I4gnENaSpMnoZ rTFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LpnbIaonugYzIakx+Lh/zS3IoHUZUa82k25u5CnbiLw=; b=SwixSYk8wo7R0iTfPX+X33sUow4YpGwxZ4sEnsF2c4l5oJVoF2Vsrx4Khil0gkkPuQ w9csMWU9ZrZSkFDmO6h9iTtnr3lKlYemG1+dNTk0/zsYlOTknG8kOQEy2OdS5R8oJwAm Qdrx3k7bpLqm05Y5kGcIVVRlKkBqvhScXW6+Kan5ghKZIyx3YB2TvTLlcFtzCJJKGcr3 L80OPERGVjj9iyrk2HHNxt9X4DdnA6WZkye0WqgWZXEzfjCMKnbYFkjKuwVaKfbk55VD Q9pY4YXRT9CWMSgUvBfHOhR6Q3pkhlcWn++S9q7AdnqnNp18aUhRxSgqLDtcNbZZjuko UyAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAOq8fz698HDHl+neUmyPAPsl6YSLTR/h0X+v1v9udAA4J4by89 wVgMneV+ckMS79+dXhOBLJUe6oPbDD7PNqQ= X-Received: by 10.36.37.78 with SMTP id g75mr11631126itg.94.1494957047760; Tue, 16 May 2017 10:50:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.8.220 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2017 10:50:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170516171028.5eagqr2sw5a2i77d@kitenet.net> References: <20170516171028.5eagqr2sw5a2i77d@kitenet.net> From: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 19:50:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: reversion in GIT_COMMON_DIR refs path To: Joey Hess Cc: Git Mailing List , =?UTF-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41jIER1eQ==?= , Peter Simons Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Joey Hess wrote: > Bisecting this test suite failure > https://git-annex.branchable.com/git-annex_in_nixpkgs_fails_with_git-2.13.0/ > I landed on commit f57f37e2e1bf11ab4cdfd221ad47e961ba9353a0 to git. That links's broken for me. Looking at your wiki it looks like you mean: https://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/git-annex_in_nixpkgs_fails_with_git-2.13.0/ I have no idea what this bug is about, but side-question: It looks like this is git-annex's own test suite that's failing with 2.13.0, is that right? It would be very nice to have a test in git itself to test with git-annex. I.e. some optional test that just pulls down the latest git-annex release & runs its tests against the git we're building. Thanks for annex b.t.w., I use it a lot.