From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>,
Stephen Morton <stephen.c.morton@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Git Scaling: What factors most affect Git performance for a large repo?
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 20:36:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACBZZX7O77zfn75vJXsSyR58UjC_bfTu-DWwJC8n2fhemVBn2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa908z44h.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I actually ran this a few times while testing it, so this is a before
>> and after on a hot cache of linux.git with 406 tags v.s. ~140k. I ran
>> the gc + repack + bitmaps for both repos noted in an earlier reply of
>> mine, and took the fastest run out of 3:
>>
>> $ time (git log master -100 >/dev/null)
>> Before: real 0m0.021s
>> After: real 0m2.929s
>
> Do you force --decorate with some config? Or do you see similar
> performance difference with "git rev-parse master", too?
Yes, I had log.decorate=short set in my config. With --no-decorate:
$ time (git log --no-decorate -100 >/dev/null)
# Before: real 0m0.010s
# After: real 0m0.065s
>> $ time (git status >/dev/null)
>> # Around 150ms, no noticeable difference
>
> This is understandable, as it will not look at any ref other than
> HEAD.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-02 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-19 21:26 Git Scaling: What factors most affect Git performance for a large repo? Stephen Morton
2015-02-19 22:21 ` Stefan Beller
2015-02-19 23:06 ` Stephen Morton
2015-02-19 23:15 ` Stefan Beller
2015-02-19 23:29 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-20 0:04 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-20 12:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-20 12:11 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-20 14:25 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-20 21:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-02 19:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2015-03-02 20:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-20 22:02 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2015-02-24 12:44 ` Michael Haggerty
2015-03-02 19:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-21 3:51 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-19 23:38 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-20 0:42 ` David Turner
2015-02-20 20:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-23 20:23 ` David Turner
2015-02-21 4:01 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-25 12:02 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-20 0:03 ` brian m. carlson
2015-02-20 16:06 ` Stephen Morton
2015-02-20 16:38 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-02-20 17:16 ` brian m. carlson
2015-02-20 22:08 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2015-02-20 22:58 ` brian m. carlson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-20 6:57 Martin Fick
2015-02-20 18:29 ` David Turner
2015-02-20 20:37 ` Martin Fick
2015-02-21 0:41 ` David Turner
2015-02-20 19:27 ` Randall S. Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACBZZX7O77zfn75vJXsSyR58UjC_bfTu-DWwJC8n2fhemVBn2w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=stephen.c.morton@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).