From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Tan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] teach git pull to handle --log= Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 19:15:19 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1431508661-21729-1-git-send-email-pyokagan@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git List , Stefan Beller , Johannes Schindelin To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 15 13:15:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YtDaT-00063D-I2 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 15 May 2015 13:15:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934149AbbEOLPZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 07:15:25 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:36264 "EHLO mail-la0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754791AbbEOLPV (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 07:15:21 -0400 Received: by lagv1 with SMTP id v1so114183113lag.3 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 04:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SRjnM+WSLaq0bJgIuQ5AvSODtC+x3ahdGSAyiSTIL8E=; b=kLqEAU9SI2sZ37rrWbAL9d2A8dXZHYDn7taC8ABis5n3LVvYX19+66r1FC5G5bhUZg WlQ74dgDBmw3SU+gNNcQjJfaxZVPR4ijqqigw2CbR63Uo9gSk+chPMHaaNCRikzxOCmk F7HfIykuZ6yUIPm0LIOGD9tzCIll34Fk43T4qRaABa5Z2jxyOGz8v0W/Pvyi1MBcpxPB hL6Gq7OOjcgvjLmN/LBo1W7Pj39TWWckrYwdCdZ5Ko1URRiR8EAP4xEqhED35MBjT6Rc vn41n9xeRk2sDX8X/WtLRc58OguVzBLQ+9o959V668gg12w7lozvZ2IMMjh1LJnQMGsb 4nwQ== X-Received: by 10.152.4.72 with SMTP id i8mr6976847lai.32.1431688519548; Fri, 15 May 2015 04:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.74.133 with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 04:15:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > One advice; for a small patch like this one (and the "pull.ff vs > merge.ff" one, too), it is not necessary or even desirable to do a > two-step "first add a failure test and then another patch to fix and > flip the expectation" series. Just do the fix and add a test to > expect success. > > After all, the primary reason why we add test is *not* for you to > demonstrate that what you did works as expected. It is to catch > other people breaking what you did in the future. Since I will be re-rolling all the patches to remove the use of "verbose" I guess I will squash the patches as well. Thanks.