Bug tracker (again)

Bug tracker (again)

[Duy Nguyen]

(Dropped some CC as this becomes a different topic)

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Don't take it the wrong way. I was just summarizing the last round. It
>> surprised me though that this went under my radar. Perhaps a bug
>> tracker is not a bad idea after all (if Jeff went missing, this bug
>> could fall under the crack)
>
> I'm happy to plug
> - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=git;include=tags:upstream
> - http://packages.qa.debian.org/common/index.html (email subscription link:
>   source package = git; under "Advanced" it's possible to subscribe to
>   bug-tracking system emails and skip e.g. the automated build stuff)
> - https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting (bug reporting interface -
>   unfortunately the important part is buried under "Sending the bug
>   report via e-mail")
> again. :)

So I wonder if we use debian bug tracker for git upstream. I haven't
used debian tracker much (or debian for that matter). It's probably
best just ask instead of searching and guessing.

I suppose if debian people (mostly debian git maintainer?) are not
opposed to us using their tracker for upstream bugs, then it's just a
matter of associating a mail thread with a bug number for tracking.
That could be probably be done via email, then reply all to the thread
in question with a bug email address. After that all email discussions
are also tracked via this bug email. Anybody can help track bugs. Say
if 3 weekdays are over and nobody said a thing about something that
looks a lot like bug, then it should be tracked (problems that can be
quickly fixed do not need tracking). Hmm?
-- 
Duy

Re: Bug tracker (again)

[brian m. carlson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1912 bytes --]

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 02:26:57PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> So I wonder if we use debian bug tracker for git upstream. I haven't
> used debian tracker much (or debian for that matter). It's probably
> best just ask instead of searching and guessing.
> 
> I suppose if debian people (mostly debian git maintainer?) are not
> opposed to us using their tracker for upstream bugs, then it's just a
> matter of associating a mail thread with a bug number for tracking.
> That could be probably be done via email, then reply all to the thread
> in question with a bug email address. After that all email discussions
> are also tracked via this bug email. Anybody can help track bugs. Say
> if 3 weekdays are over and nobody said a thing about something that
> looks a lot like bug, then it should be tracked (problems that can be
> quickly fixed do not need tracking). Hmm?

All interaction with the Debian BTS (except for viewing bugs) is done
over email.  That's what I like about it.  It will automatically insert
an appropriate piece in the subject line (Bug#1393:) and anyone can mail
the control bot to manipulate a bug.  It also has the concept of
usertags, so you can create your own set of tags with user
git@vger.kernel.org (or your personal address, if you desire), and then
sort and display bugs appropriately.

Junio seemed lukewarm on the idea of using a bug tracker; however, I
think debbugs (either the Debian BTS or a separate instance) is probably
the best-suited to an email-based workflow of all the systems I've used.
Of course, it's up to the regulars (and probably ultimately Junio)
whether this is something that Git as a project would benefit from.

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]