From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Shallow clones with explicit history cutoff?
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:27:03 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACsJy8CSCcaFNxqqBLAnb5NXkwT+wVXCVmB8uF3RYwqRmz4tuw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20140821T171416-31@post.gmane.org>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> wrote:
> What I would like to have, instead, is a version of shallow cloning which
> cuts off not at a pre-determined depth, but at a given branch (or set of
> branches). In other words, given
>
> +-J--K (packaged)
> / /
> +-F--G--H----I (clean)
> / /
> A---B---C---D---E (upstream)
>
> a command "git clone --shallow-until upstream $REPO" (or however that would
> be named) would create a shallow git archive which contains branches
> packaged+clean, with commits FGHIJK. In contrast, with --single-branch and
> --depth 4 I would get CGHIJK, which isn't what I'd want.
I would imagine a more generic mechanism "git clone
--shallow-rev=<rev> $REPO" where you could pass anything that "git
rev-list" can accept (maybe more restricted, and some verification
required). --shallow-rev could be repeated. So in your case it could
be "git clone --shallow-rev="^A" $REPO". We could even maybe turn
--depth into a generic thing that is accepted by rev-list so that it
could be easily combined with other rev-list options (--shallow-rev
and --depth are mutually exclusive).
> As I have not spent too much time with the git sources lately (as in "None
> at all"), some pointers where to start implementing this would be
> appreciated, assuming (a) this has a reasonable chance of landing in git and
> (b) nobody beats me to it. ;-)
I'd like to see this implemented. You are not the first one
complaining about the (lack of) flexibility of --depth. If you have
time, I may be able to support (I should not take on another topic
given my many ongoing/unfinished topics). The starting point is
upload-pack.c. And GIT_TRACE env variable will be your friend. Search
for get_shallow_commits(). There the function is supposed to traverse
down from want_obj and set/unset SHALLOW/NOT_SHALLOW flags properly.
SHALLOW flag should be set right before the cut-out commit (e.g. B and
F if you want to cut A out). NOT_SHALLOW flags could be used to remove
shallow lines in the receiver repo. If you traverse past an existing
shallow point in the client (this is the fetch/pull case, not clone),
then you should set NOT_SHALLOW so the client knows to remove that
point from their $GIT_DIR/shallow. Once you set these properly, the
rest should work.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-22 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-21 15:39 Shallow clones with explicit history cutoff? Matthias Urlichs
2014-08-22 13:27 ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
2014-08-22 14:46 ` Matthias Urlichs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACsJy8CSCcaFNxqqBLAnb5NXkwT+wVXCVmB8uF3RYwqRmz4tuw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias@urlichs.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).