From: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Angelo Borsotti <angelo.borsotti@gmail.com>,
Drew Northup <n1xim.email@gmail.com>,
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>,
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] push: return reject reasons via a mask
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:00:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEUsAPaPPZPR3VM1w=nFhdRG_enKwRpiW2X29z0731VdEMezMg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vobikryrc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> writes:
>
>> Pass all rejection reasons back from transport_push(). The logic is
>> simpler and more flexible with regard to providing useful feedback.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
>> ---
>
> In any case, naming it as "reject_mask" is like calling a counter as
> "counter_int". It is more important to name it after its purpose
> than after its type
Agreed.
> and because this is to record the reasons why
> the push was rejected, "rejection_reason" might be a better name for
> it.
Yes, that is better for all the reasons you mention. I will fix this up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-27 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-23 4:21 [PATCH v5 0/7] push: update remote tags only with force Chris Rorvick
2012-11-23 4:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] push: return reject reasons via a mask Chris Rorvick
2012-11-26 18:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-27 3:00 ` Chris Rorvick [this message]
2012-11-23 4:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] push: add advice for rejected tag reference Chris Rorvick
2012-11-23 4:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] push: flag updates Chris Rorvick
2012-11-23 4:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] push: flag updates that require force Chris Rorvick
2012-11-23 4:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] push: require force for refs under refs/tags/ Chris Rorvick
2012-11-26 18:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-27 4:17 ` Chris Rorvick
2012-11-27 17:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-28 5:18 ` [PATCH] push: cleanup push rules comment Chris Rorvick
2012-11-28 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-23 4:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] push: require force for annotated tags Chris Rorvick
2012-11-23 4:21 ` [PATCH 7/7] push: clarify rejection of update to non-commit-ish Chris Rorvick
2012-11-26 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-27 3:52 ` Chris Rorvick
2012-11-27 17:11 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEUsAPaPPZPR3VM1w=nFhdRG_enKwRpiW2X29z0731VdEMezMg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=chris@rorvick.com \
--cc=angelo.borsotti@gmail.com \
--cc=draenog@pld-linux.org \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=n1xim.email@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).