Re: Finding all branches(remote and local) include given commit?

["Yi, EungJun" <semtlenori@gmail.com>]

Oops, it's just my mistake. git-remote also does not have '--all' option.

2012/5/12 Yi, EungJun <semtlenori@gmail.com>:
> Wow, I should do like this:
>
> $ git branch -a --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f
> * master
>  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
>  remotes/origin/master
>  remotes/origin/next
>  remotes/origin/pu
>
> git-branch has '-a' but not '-all', and git-remote has '--all' but not '-a'.
>
> This is a bit confusing for me. Why don't the two commands have the
> option under the same name?
>
>
> 2012/5/12 Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>:
>> On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 20:42 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote:
>>> Is there any way to find remote and local branches include given commit?
>>>
>>> e.g.
>>>
>>> $ git branch --all --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f
>>> * master
>>>   remotes/origin/next
>>>
>>> As you know, it does not work and "git branch --contains" finds only
>>> local branches.
>>
>> Works For Me. What version are you trying it with? Are you sure that
>> remote-tracking branches do contain that commit?
>>
>> From a quick look through the log and release notes, it was never
>> mentioned as a fix. The log contains 3f7701a4 from 2007 which fixes 'git
>> describe --all --contains' which, though unlikely, might be related.
>> This commit was however part of release 1.5.4, which makes it unlikely
>> you'd be using something older.
>>
>>   cmn
>>