From: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
To: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>,
Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
chriscool@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t6030: explicitly test for bisection cleanup
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 23:27:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFZEwPMyts8msEgdHOiPfC-_HEXp8SJ7-8FQScr-af=5tSxq7w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463134469-26071-1-git-send-email-pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is not an improvement in the test coverage but it helps in making
> it explicit as to know what exactly is the error as other tests are
> focussed on testing other things but they do indirectly test for this.
>
> Mentored-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> I faced this problem while converting `bisect_clean_state` and the tests
> where showing breakages but it wasn't clear as to where exactly are they
> breaking. This will patch will help in that. Also I tested the test
> coverage of the test suite before this patch and it covers this (I did
> this by purposely changing names of files in git-bisect.sh and running
> the test suite).
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
> ---
> t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
> index e74662b..1fb5ad9 100755
> --- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
> +++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
> @@ -894,4 +894,21 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect start takes options and revs in any order' '
> test_cmp expected actual
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'git bisect reset cleans bisection state properly' '
> + git bisect reset &&
> + git bisect start &&
> + git bisect good $HASH1 &&
> + git bisect bad $HASH4 &&
> + git bisect reset &&
> + test -z "$(git for-each-ref "refs/bisect/*")" &&
> + ! test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV" &&
> + ! test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
> + ! test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG" &&
> + ! test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_RUN" &&
> + ! test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS" &&
> + ! test -s "$GIT_DIR/head-name" &&
> + ! test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_HEAD" &&
> + ! test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START"
> +'
> +
> test_done
> --
> 2.8.2
>
Anyone any comments?
Regards,
Pranit Bauva
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-27 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-13 10:14 [PATCH] t6030: explicitly test for bisection cleanup Pranit Bauva
2016-05-27 17:57 ` Pranit Bauva [this message]
2016-05-27 19:00 ` Christian Couder
2016-05-27 19:22 ` Pranit Bauva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFZEwPMyts8msEgdHOiPfC-_HEXp8SJ7-8FQScr-af=5tSxq7w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pranit.bauva@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).