From: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@gmail.com>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Eric Sunshine <ericsunshine@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GSoC 2016 | Proposal | Incremental Rewrite of git bisect
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:13:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFZEwPPKE1kODzSD4ZqZOehSB2SUUAC5JF-j7__kA2obpV92Tw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD0vm1Sn07ickfPz5segbM-M7+HR43CMMGsB9WTqj5s-yw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Christian Couder
<christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> - you will add an option to "git bisect--helper" to perform what the
>>> git-bisect.sh function did, and
>>> - you will create a test script for "git bisect--helper" in which you
>>> will test each option?
>>
>> I had very initially planned to do this. But Matthieu pointed out that
>> it would be much better to use the existing test suite rather than
>> creating one which can lead to less coverage.
>
> Ok, then perhaps:
>
> - you will add tests to existing test scripts, so that each "git
> bisect--helper" option is (indirectly) tested.
Yes. I will mention this in the proposal also. Thanks for reminding.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-25 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-23 23:27 GSoC 2016 | Proposal | Incremental Rewrite of git bisect Pranit Bauva
2016-03-25 9:02 ` Christian Couder
2016-03-25 9:15 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-03-25 9:58 ` Pranit Bauva
2016-03-25 9:50 ` Pranit Bauva
2016-03-25 10:15 ` Pranit Bauva
2016-03-25 11:40 ` Christian Couder
2016-03-25 11:43 ` Pranit Bauva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFZEwPPKE1kODzSD4ZqZOehSB2SUUAC5JF-j7__kA2obpV92Tw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pranit.bauva@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=ericsunshine@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
--cc=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=stefanbeller@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).