From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CA71FA21 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752029AbdJEVcU (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:32:20 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:45766 "EHLO mail-qk0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751388AbdJEVcS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:32:18 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id f199so2984346qke.2 for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:32:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dd/mQg+kq3Xe9tSyN+I/BSBsmfqF6dsd9bYG1pthpIA=; b=VEfjACPYd/2dX/bK7NlWm+PQZNY5JLxlMvvvGN3rWBZuToPWLYcyrmlyEtDmf/AC47 NkHijKjL/DQHKMha99niNGgamwzr4yEc++klj/fTuaQR+zAgYB4TBgVxjNHiNVzb9Dxe 6Lnm1oXYHisWylj4iA5GAao8Ykn+SZR/+evwYw+THeFXhjWt4RxDXmQdT7C5KwKCOXFW jtd/oJaoq4DrD39rW7BFldg6JrtglaqyNim4fa7Xv+c00ejWDQUFXP21IxK6t/G80cp/ ZOg6AQXHGrcz352/TrQkKybex+vNXX4Wh9ZOmI0/bvxjdpVqVlaMXDVnb4Wg7FVB3C4f pxWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dd/mQg+kq3Xe9tSyN+I/BSBsmfqF6dsd9bYG1pthpIA=; b=hGMpIz2/NwzAGYyJQTTjvtYHvlT6/wvD4e8AVN1vP/e+Wm99V303YIg9FRSioiNSZi PsHceRNYusl9MgyahAMrx7Usl6DvlO8C3EUjsw7iP+8+QMfPlftNqzkUjabKLpQALPK+ FM2W/iPWHe+RGV5dTU42CJEA8Ia/4y/gEkonUqkDNLW7ZKwYQkpatFmOGXNzEyw/W+NM R4k+a8I9+mBTd7j+84aMyViJNjgaSEQtBwdTeVKBANxWfiwLW6bobA8TT+ULVX17JVQg rUGx2+R7VRrwaC1hH3lKMwLcEq2vExYppabL0Kp2HxE6O8ih4TaTBG4nN++gZsoTNKQq 6A0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWvSbAIJK9bo7qpSt0fywqyBwBlMvth3KAuCMtc/IVyT3XQ/jtx IC5Ou9maxMQYx7zehCtAa/BSbbqqKjsiO62wvAH3aN9R X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QD4oKLXEBZy73wK1IlNXVCn/b4uZQr5vD+VjRYutP82CklZJQACyRzenXjH4dXLTJ++gFjp18RK7j54JYdqTTA= X-Received: by 10.233.239.140 with SMTP id d134mr9347630qkg.308.1507239137524; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:32:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.102.46 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 14:32:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Stefan Beller Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 14:32:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: is it "core.excludesfile" or "core.excludesFile"? To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Git Mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > more pedantic nitpickery, but the git source/docs seems to bounce > all over the place as to which of those forms is the right one. > opinions? In the code we use all lowercase to compare (any input is converted to lowercase); in the docs we try to come up with a sufficient cameLcase to not confuse the user. In tests, I don't know?