From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 01/16] stringlist: add from_space_separated_string
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:54:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGZ79katiDViBzC8sMJaDqaekc4+KSyTnfdYD-uni9K72iAVpg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cTsBU2t=NJEe16N2CMyYrWgbP-NvoKxNQ9QdPiokXj+hw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/string-list.h b/string-list.h
>>> index d3809a1..88c18e9 100644
>>> --- a/string-list.h
>>> +++ b/string-list.h
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct string_list {
>>> #define STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP { NULL, 0, 0, 1, NULL }
>>>
>>> void string_list_init(struct string_list *list, int strdup_strings);
>>> +void from_space_separated_string(struct string_list *list, char *line);
>>
>> The name feels out of place. All functions in here have "string_list"
>> somewhere in their names. The implementation looks very close to
>> string_list_split() but that name's already taken.. Maybe
>> string_list_split_by_space()?
>
> Indeed. If you really want to go the specialized route, splitting only
> on whitespace, then Duy's suggestion makes sense. Alternately,
> string_list_split_ws() might be easily understood while still
> remaining somewhat terse.
>
> However, why make this so specialized? A more generalized function
> could be more widely useful. For instance, you could introduce a
> function very similar to string_list_split() to which you supply
> multiple delimiter characters (as a 'const char *') rather than the
> single delimiter character accepted by string_list_split(). The
> function could be named string_list_split_any() or
> string_list_tokenize().
>
> Also, it's ugly and inconvenient to require the incoming string be
> non-const, and feels as if you're letting the interface be dictated by
> an implementation detail (underlying use of strtok_r).
I see. I think I can even use string_list_split here, and drop this patch.
Thanks for pointing out the flaws!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-02 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-02 0:02 [RFCv2 00/16] Protocol version 2 Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 01/16] stringlist: add from_space_separated_string Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 9:42 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-02 15:10 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-06-02 17:54 ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 02/16] upload-pack: make client capability parsing code a separate function Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 03/16] connect: rewrite feature parsing to work on string_list Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 18:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 04/16] upload-pack-2: Implement the version 2 of upload-pack Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 18:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 23:08 ` Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 05/16] remote.h: Change get_remote_heads return to void Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 21:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 21:25 ` Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 06/16] remote.h: add new struct for options Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 21:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 21:40 ` Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 21:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 07/16] transport: add infrastructure to support a protocol version number Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 08/16] transport: select transport version via command line or config Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 09/16] remote.h: add get_remote_capabilities, request_capabilities Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 21:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 10/16] transport: connect_setup appends protocol version number Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 9:58 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-02 18:04 ` Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 21:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 22:09 ` Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 11/16] remote: have preselect_capabilities Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 21:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 12/16] transport: get_refs_via_connect exchanges capabilities before refs Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 21:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 22:19 ` Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 13/16] fetch-pack: use the configured transport protocol Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 9:55 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-02 10:02 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-02 11:32 ` Ilari Liusvaara
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 14/16] t5544: add a test case for the new protocol Stefan Beller
2015-06-03 0:16 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 15/16] Documentation/technical/pack-protocol: Mention http as possible protocol Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 21:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 0:02 ` [RFCv2 16/16] Document protocol version 2 Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGZ79katiDViBzC8sMJaDqaekc4+KSyTnfdYD-uni9K72iAVpg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).