From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sverre Rabbelier Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git 1.7.6.2 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:24:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7vvct55j4h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vsjo84mx3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 07 18:59:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1LSu-0000oA-2H for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:59:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753643Ab1IGQ7B (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:59:01 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:54319 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753249Ab1IGQ7A (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:59:00 -0400 Received: by yxj19 with SMTP id 19so4079981yxj.19 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:58:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=W4Ra12NFuuyhxbSaRwO9z+skapttxu7+5ayIsd6fXxg=; b=KscecmdElqdwpW5QlPASjtMGI5TPkLKMLKfwcyAFBmYLtUcDYCjc/RnZ2MwW9zeRSc s6mUxxMscEIfk9WwieuzJ2gxc5MeZ6GSJ2zi1z7woHsbQt2BVX4nZHM3xJbwEu+36gnR ok4a5JYZtHC7i5AKHDkwc+7zYC6tW14J2HyDg= Received: by 10.68.38.103 with SMTP id f7mr3834692pbk.500.1315394718122; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 04:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.59.39 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 04:24:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7vsjo84mx3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Heya, On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 13:22, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> That's interesting, how did revert a merge commit? > > Does "git revert --help" lack the description? It warns that "As a result, later merges will only bring in tree changes introduced by commits that are not ancestors of the previously reverted merge." How would you later re-merge the series when the problems it has are fixed though? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier