From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sverre Rabbelier Subject: Re: [PATCH v0] fast-import: Add drop command Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:01:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1316878065-11782-1-git-send-email-vitor.hda@gmail.com> <1316878065-11782-2-git-send-email-vitor.hda@gmail.com> <20110924193733.GB10955@elie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Dmitry Ivankov , Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, David Barr To: Vitor Antunes X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 24 20:02:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RIOrH-0004Dj-OI for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:02:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755864Ab1JXSCh (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:02:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:37606 "EHLO mail-qy0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755823Ab1JXSCg (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:02:36 -0400 Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so5808312qyk.19 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=FapW5Psaq7oKUqWULeRPkeTuPvgC2p3KvULmOE7xCDw=; b=AvEh1uARkOEZwcG1riQULWx/z9u7W/g7KVdXkCSGt87kuH/EN30I4LXk500fguOcTd nyDauVoHsyWq8bvzSV1gA92p7tJuv6oRE/rdcJe6+B4AJsDNIpokvcdmXUd0IcnAIkp+ dSxskviTFC/kBui+m3AflaSZeWPGafybBAihM= Received: by 10.182.7.10 with SMTP id f10mr3535238oba.56.1319479356093; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.52.3 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:01:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Heya, On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 18:37, Vitor Antunes wrote: > This thread did not receive any updates for a long time. > Could someone provide some feedback? > > Is this feasible? Does it make sense to add this command? If not, why? I for one welcome our new branch deleting overlords :). You mention that checkpointing solves some of the concerns raised by others in this thread, would automatic checkpointing be way to make sure everything is as it should be? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier