From: Seyi Chamber <kuforiji98@gmail.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] t/unit-tests: adapt lib-reftable{c,h} helper functions to clar
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:04:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGedMteAkHj0xc2iq7T+CWa=uJWWg0me8hD6x=Nv8PHPtO1P_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBiKUGn7avRUcehV@pks.im>
On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 10:52, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 08:27:16AM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 10:58, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 06:53:02PM +0100, Seyi Kuforiji wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h b/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h
> > > > index e4c360fa7e..2958db5dc0 100644
> > > > --- a/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h
> > > > +++ b/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h
> > > > @@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
> > > >
> > > > struct reftable_buf;
> > > >
> > > > -void t_reftable_set_hash(uint8_t *p, int i, enum reftable_hash id);
> > > > +void cl_reftable_set_hash(uint8_t *p, int i, enum reftable_hash id);
> > > >
> > > > -struct reftable_writer *t_reftable_strbuf_writer(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> > > > +struct reftable_writer *cl_reftable_strbuf_writer(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> > > > struct reftable_write_options *opts);
> > > >
> > > > -void t_reftable_write_to_buf(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> > > > +void cl_reftable_write_to_buf(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> > > > struct reftable_ref_record *refs,
> > > > size_t nrecords,
> > > > struct reftable_log_record *logs,
> > >
> > > It is quite weird that we declare the replacement functions in
> > > "unit-test.h" in the first commit only to remove them at a later point.
> > > It would make way more sense if we introduced the functions in
> > > "t/unit/lib-reftable.{c,h}" right from the start and then only remove
> > > the unused functions in the last step.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> >
> > If I get it correctly, you're suggesting I have both the original
> > functions and the clar-based variant in `t/unit/lib-reftable.{c,h}`
>
> Yup, exactly.
>
> Patrick
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for the suggestion to move both the original t-helpers and the
Clar-based cl_ versions into `t/unit/lib-reftable.{c,h}`.
I’ve tried doing that but ran into some build issues. The Clar-based
functions use clar_assert and clar_assert_equal, which aren’t
available to non-Clar tests. Since both sets of helpers would live in
the same object file, this causes linker errors for binaries that
don’t link against Clar.
I also hit Makefile warnings like “target 'lib-reftable.o' given more
than once,” due to the object being included in both Clar and non-Clar
test builds. And with all declarations in one header, non-Clar tests
see prototypes for Clar-only functions they can't link.
Also facing errors like these:
`LINK t/unit-tests/bin/t-reftable-basics
/usr/bin/ld: t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.o: in function
`cl_reftable_strbuf_writer':
/home/seyik/git/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.c:113:(.text+0x520):
undefined reference to `clar__assert'`
What would you recommend I do to fix this?
Thanks,
Seyi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-26 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 17:52 [PATCH v2 00/10] t/unit-tests: convert unit-tests to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] t/unit-tests: implement reftable test helper functions in unit-test.{c,h} Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 23:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable basics test to use clar test framework Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable block test to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 7:37 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05 9:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 21:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-06 5:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable merged " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable pq " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable reader " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable readwrite " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable record " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable stack " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 9:11 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05 9:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] t/unit-tests: adapt lib-reftable{c,h} helper functions to clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 7:27 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05 9:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-26 9:04 ` Seyi Chamber [this message]
2025-05-26 12:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGedMteAkHj0xc2iq7T+CWa=uJWWg0me8hD6x=Nv8PHPtO1P_w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=kuforiji98@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).