From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Seymour Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 1/7] bisect: move argument parsing before state modification. Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:23:25 +1000 Message-ID: References: <1312459263-16911-1-git-send-email-jon.seymour@gmail.com> <1312459263-16911-2-git-send-email-jon.seymour@gmail.com> <201109070816.16655.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <4E67B2F2.9070806@kdbg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Christian Couder , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, jnareb@gmail.com, jrnieder@gmail.com To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 08 03:23:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1TL2-0005oV-Q3 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:23:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757762Ab1IHBX1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:23:27 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.212.43]:41136 "EHLO mail-vw0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757722Ab1IHBX0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:23:26 -0400 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so395103vws.2 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:23:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jq+qAYQ8kNfBJgmKPSxgAxgNtHAYayY6p5mx55aQJro=; b=p2IHrAx5d8DIpxxr6J2ohgZxAEATgTSOkVMGK+kO8ObyOdT43EA13RMfgKpNUICBq9 4bLS6GGdsI8Gic8dN5xRnExUYqlOJH/zf3JwNREAuu68blH1bNzITi4y9LF5qYOcqJmv 6UvQlS9m5ZsenT0OUfeqEopFpNQZ7+GEcbARg= Received: by 10.52.75.230 with SMTP id f6mr75782vdw.276.1315445005363; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:23:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.106.137 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:23:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E67B2F2.9070806@kdbg.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Am 07.09.2011 08:16, schrieb Christian Couder: > IOW, I think the new behavior is *much* better than the old behavior. > There is perhaps no surprise that I agree with Hannes. Certainly, it seemed saner to me to do argument validation before state update. [ Also, the earlier iterations of the --no-checkout series needed the new behaviour. Not sure if that is still true, but I suspect it is ]. jon.